Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun;30(26):67974-67996.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26893-7. Epub 2023 May 4.

Land application of industrial wastes: impacts on soil quality, biota, and human health

Affiliations
Review

Land application of industrial wastes: impacts on soil quality, biota, and human health

Shamali De Silva et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Globally, waste disposal options such as landfill, incineration, and discharge to water, are not preferred long-term solutions due to their social, environmental, political, and economic implications. However, there is potential for increasing the sustainability of industrial processes by considering land application of industrial wastes. Applying waste to land can have beneficial outcomes including reducing waste sent to landfill and providing alternative nutrient sources for agriculture and other primary production. However, there are also potential hazards, including environmental contamination. This article reviewed the literature on industrial waste applications to soils and assessed the associated hazards and benefits. The review investigated wastes in relation to soil characteristics, dynamics between soils and waste constituents, and possible impacts on plants, animals, and humans. The current body of literature demonstrates the potential for the application of industrial waste into agricultural soils. The main challenge for applying industrial wastes to land is the presence of contaminants in some wastes and managing these to enhance positive effects and reduce negative outcomes to within acceptable limits. Examination of the literature also revealed several gaps in the research and opportunities for further investigation: specifically, a lack of long-term experiments and mass balance assessments, variable waste composition, and negative public opinion.

Keywords: Agriculture; Contamination; Emerging chemicals of concern; Groundwater; Review; Risk assessment; Soil amendment; Sustainable waste disposal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual diagram of the fate and behaviour of contaminants in industrial wastes applied to land

References

    1. ACCC, (2008) Examination of fertiliser prices. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), Canberra. ISBN: 978 1 921393 82 2
    1. Adriano DC, Weber J, Bolan NS, Paramasivam S, Koo BJ, Sajwan KS. Effects of high rates of coal fly ash on soil, turfgrass, and groundwater quality. Wat Air Soil Poll. 2002;139(1):365–385. doi: 10.1023/A:1015895922471. - DOI
    1. Aigberua AO, Tarawou JT, Abasi CY. Effect of oxidation-reduction fluctuations on metal mobility of speciated metals and arsenic in bottom sediments of Middleton River, Bayelsa State. Nigeria JASEM. 2018;22(9):1511–1517. doi: 10.4314/jasem.v22i9.25. - DOI
    1. Aitken RL, Campbell DJ, Bell LC. Properties of Australian fly ashes relevant to their agronomic utilization. Aust J Soil Res. 1984;22(4):443–453. doi: 10.1071/SR9840443. - DOI
    1. Al-Abed SR, Jegadeesan G, Purandare J, Allen D. Arsenic release from iron rich mineral processing waste: influence of pH and redox potential. Chemosphere. 2007;66(4):775–782. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.045. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources