Clinical ethics consultation documentation in the era of open notes
- PMID: 37138339
- PMCID: PMC10158359
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00904-1
Clinical ethics consultation documentation in the era of open notes
Abstract
Background: In 2021, federal rules from the 21st Century Cures Act mandated most clinical notes be made available in real-time, online, and free of charge to patients, a practice often referred to as "open notes." This legislation was passed to support medical information transparency and reinforce trust in the clinician-patient relationship; however, it created additional complexities in that relationship and raises questions of what should be included in notes intended to be read by both clinicians and patients.
Main body: Even prior to open notes, how an ethics consultant should document a clinical ethics consultation was widely debated as there can be competing interests, differing moral values, and disagreement about pertinent medical information in any given encounter. Patients can now access documentation of these discussions through online portals which broach sensitive topics related to end-of-life care, autonomy, religious/cultural conflict, veracity, confidentiality, and many others. Clinical ethics consultation notes must be ethically robust, accurate, and helpful for healthcare workers and ethics committee members, but now also sensitive to the needs of patients and family members who can read them in real-time.
Conclusion: We explore implications of open notes for ethics consultation, review clinical ethics consultation documentation styles, and offer recommendations for documentation in this new era.
Keywords: Clinical Ethics; Ethics Consultation; Ethics Documentation; Narrative Medicine; Open Notes.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
JM receives funding as a member of the Ethics Advisory Board for Partner Therapeutics and received an honorarium for a lecture delivered to Sanofi-Genzyme Global Oncology, both for work unrelated to this manuscript. EM is a consultant at TMRW Life Sciences for work unrelated to the manuscript. The other authors report no relevant conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Bonamici S. H.R.34–114th Congress (2015–2016): 21st Century Cures Act [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/34
-
- Delbanco T, Walker J, Darer JD, Elmore JG, Feldman HJ, Leveille SG, Ralston JD, Ross SE, Vodicka E, Weber VD. Open notes: doctors and patients signing on. Annals of internal medicine.2010 Jul20;153(2):121–5. - PubMed
-
- Bruce CR, Smith ML, Tawose OM, Sharp RR. Practical guidance for charting ethics consultations. InHEC forum 2014 Mar (Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.79–93).Springer Netherlands. - PubMed
-
- Ethics Consultations [Internet]. American Medical Association. [cited 2022 Jan 7]. Available from: https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/ethics-consultations
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources