Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;37(9):e14998.
doi: 10.1111/ctr.14998. Epub 2023 May 3.

Impact of newly diagnosed prostate cancer at time of evaluation for renal transplantation

Affiliations

Impact of newly diagnosed prostate cancer at time of evaluation for renal transplantation

Florence Poinard et al. Clin Transplant. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Systematic screening for prostate cancer is widely recommended in candidates for renal transplant at the time of listing. There are concerns that overdiagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer may result in reducing access to transplant without demonstrated oncological benefits. The objective of the study was to assess the outcome of newly diagnosed prostate cancer in candidates for transplant at the time of listing, and its impact on transplant access and transplant outcomes according to treatment options. This retrospective study was conducted over 10 years in 12 French transplant centers. Patients included were candidates for renal transplant at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis. Demographical and clinical data regarding renal disease, prostate cancer, and transplant surgery were collected. The primary outcome of the study was the interval between prostate cancer diagnosis and active listing according to treatment options. Overall median time from prostate cancer diagnosis to active listing was 25.0 months [16.4-40.2], with statistically significant differences in median time between the radiotherapy and the active surveillance groups (p = .03). Prostate cancer treatment modalities had limited impact on access and outcome of renal transplantation. Active surveillance in low-risk patients does not seem to compromise access to renal transplantation, nor does it impact oncological outcomes.

Keywords: chronic; kidney failure; kidney transplantation; prostatic neoplasms; waiting lists.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Maisonneuve P, Agodoa L, Gellert R, et al. Cancer in patients on dialysis for end-stage renal disease: an international collaborative study. The Lancet. 1999;354(9173):93-99. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06154-1
    1. Rodríguez Faba O, Boissier R, Budde K, et al. European association of urology guidelines on renal transplantation: update 2018. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(2):208-215. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2018.07.014
    1. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79(2):243-262. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042
    1. Abramowicz D, Cochat P, Claas FHJ, et al. European Renal Best Practice Guideline on kidney donor and recipient evaluation and perioperative care. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30(11):1790-1797. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfu216
    1. Wyld M, Morton RL, Hayen A, Howard K, Webster AC. A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments. PLoS Med. 2012;9(9):e1001307. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001307

LinkOut - more resources