Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr 17:9:1078403.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1078403. eCollection 2022.

Lumbar posterior group muscle degeneration: Influencing factors of adjacent vertebral body re-fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty

Affiliations
Review

Lumbar posterior group muscle degeneration: Influencing factors of adjacent vertebral body re-fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty

Ming Chen et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the study was to explore the influencing factors of adjacent vertebral re-fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 55 patients with adjacent vertebral re-fracture after PVP operation for OVCFs in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2019, they were followed up for 1 year and included in the fracture group. According to the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, we collected the clinical data of 55 patients with OVCFs without adjacent vertebral re-fracture after PVP in the same period and included them in the non-fracture group. We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis on the influencing factors of adjacent vertebral re-fracture in patients with OVCFs after PVP.

Results: There were significant differences in body mass index (BMI), bone mineral density (BMD) T-value, amount of bone cement injected, bone cement leakage, history of glucocorticoid use, cross-sectional area (CSA), cross-sectional area asymmetry (CSAA), fat infiltration rate (FIR), and fat infiltration rate asymmetry (FIRA) of lumbar posterior group muscles [multifidus (MF) and erector spinae (ES)] between the two groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in sex, age, or time from the first fracture to operation, the CAS, CSAA, FIR, and FIRA of psoas major (PS) between the two groups (p > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed that a higher dose of bone cement, greater CSAA and FIR of multifidus, and higher CSAA of erector spinae were independent risk factors for recurrent fractures of adjacent vertebrae after PVP.

Conclusion: There are many risk factors for recurrent vertebral fracture after PVP in patients with OVCFs, and degeneration of paraspinal muscles (especially posterior lumbar muscles) may be one of the risks.

Keywords: chronic diseases in the elderly; muscular degeneration of posterior group of lumbar spine; osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture; percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP); vertebral body re-fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Measurement of cross-sectional area and intermuscular fat area of paraspinal muscle (A) (MF, multifidus; ES, erector spinae; PS, psoas major). (B) The automatic threshold setting of ImageJ distinguish fat from muscle. The range of the yellow curve is the left MF, and the red part is the fat area of MF.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Difference of paraspinal muscles parameters between the two groups (A, non-fracture group; B, fracture group). (A) left multifidus; (B) right multifidus; (C) left erector spinae; (D) right erector spinae; (E) left psoas major; and (F) right psoas major. MF-CSA, cross-sectional area of multifidus; MF-FIR, fat infiltration rate of multifidus; ES-CSA, cross-sectional area of erector spinae; ES-FIR, fat infiltration rate of erector spinae; PS-CSA, cross-sectional area of psoas major; PS-FIR, fat infilt ration rate of psoas major; Left, left paraspinal muscle; Right, right paraspinal muscle. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation of mean. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.

References

    1. Kanis J, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster J. Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis [ESCEO], The Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation [IOF]. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. (2013) 24:23–57. 10.1007/s00198-012-2074-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Odén A, McCloskey E, Kanis J, Harvey N, Johansson H. Burden of high fracture probability wordwide: secular increases 2010-2040. Osteoporos Int. (2015) 26:2243–8. 10.1007/s00198-015-3154-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yong W, Yuhong N, Junchen L, Yi L. Early effect of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. J Clin Orthop. (2020) 23:6–8.
    1. Fortin M, Omidyeganeh M, Battié M, Ahmad O, Rivaz H. Evaluation of an automated thresholding algorithm for the quantification of paraspinal muscle composition from MRI Images. Biomed Eng. (2017) 16:61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Niemeläinen R, Briand M, Battié M. Substantial asymmetry in paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area in healthy adults questions its value as a marker of low back pain and pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). (2011) 36:2152–7. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318204b05a - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources