Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Apr 17:14:1119168.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1119168. eCollection 2023.

Prognostic value of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prognostic value of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis

Feng Xian et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is highly expressed in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) tissues. But there is still a dispute over the prognostic value of PD-L1 in patients with ICC. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in patients with ICC.

Methods: We performed a meta-analysis based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guidelines. We searched the literature from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to December 5, 2022. Hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to analyze the overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and time to relapse. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger's test.

Results: Ten trials with 1944 cases were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the low-PD-L1 group had a statistically significant advantage in OS (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.38-1.79, P <0.00001), RFS (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.34-1.97, P <0.00001), and time to relapse (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.25-2.05, P = 0.0002) compared with the high-PD-L1 group. High programmed cell death (PD1)levels, on the other hand, were correlated with poorer OS (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.43-2.70; P <0.0001) and RFS (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.21-2.91; P = 0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that PD-L1 could act as an independent predictor for OS (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.14-1.91; P = 0.003) and RFS (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.22-2.47; P = 0.002), and PD1 acted as an independent predictor for OS (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.15-2.38; P = 0.006).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that high PD-L1/PD1 expression is associated with poor survival in ICC. PD-L1/PD1 may be a valuable prognostic and predictive biomarker and potential therapeutic target in ICC.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022380093.

Keywords: intrahepatic carcinoma; meta-analysis; prognostic value; programmed cell death 1 (PD-1); programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A forest plot of OS between low- and high-PD-L1 expression: (A) pooled OS by univariate analysis; (B) pooled OS by multivariate analysis. A forest plot of OS between low- and high-PD1 expression: (C) pooled OS by univariate analysis; (D) pooled OS by multivariate analysis.PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; OS, overall survival; SE, standard error.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A forest plot of RFS between low- and high-PD-L1 expression: (A) pooled RFS in univariate analysis; (B) pooled RFS in multivariate analysis. A forest plot of RFS between low- and high-PD1 expression: (C) pooled RFS in univariate analysis; (D) pooled RFS in multivariate analysis. RFS, recurrence-free survival; PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; SE, standard error.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A forest plot of time to relapse between low- and high-PD-L1 expression. PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; SE, standard error.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The subgroup analyses for PD-L1 expression related OS and RFS. (A) the subgroup analyses for PD-L1 expression related OS based on different cut-offs, (B) the subgroup analyses for PD-L1 expression related OS based on different scoring methods, (C) the subgroup analyses for PD-L1 expression related RFS based on cut-offs. NR, not reported.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Sensitivity analysis of the meta-analysis: (A) OS in PD-L1 expression; (B) RFS in PD-L1 expression; (C) TTR in PD-L1 expression; (D) OS in PD1 expression; (E) RFS in PD1 expression. PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; OS, overall survival; RFS, recurrence-free survival.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Funnel plot of the meta-analysis: (A) OS in PD-L1 expression; (B) RFS in PD-L1 expression; (C) TTR in PD-L1 expression; (D) OS in PD1 expression; (E) RFS in PD1 expression. PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; OS, overall survival; RFS, recurrence-free survival; TTR, time to relapse.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mejia JC, Pasko J. Primary liver cancers: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Clin North Am (2020) 100(3):535–49. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2020.02.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelley RK, Bridgewater J, Gores GJ, Zhu AX. Systemic therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol (2020) 72(2):353–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun C, Mezzadra R, Schumacher TN. Regulation and function of the PD-L1 checkpoint. Immunity (2018) 48(3):434–52. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ohaegbulam KC, Assal A, Lazar-Molnar E, Yao Y, Zang X. Human cancer immunotherapy with antibodies to the PD-1 and PD-L1 pathway. Trends Mol Med (2015) 21(1):24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.10.009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dong P, Xiong Y, Yue J, Hanley SJB, Watari H. Tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 signaling in cancer initiation, development and treatment: beyond immune evasion. Front In Oncol (2018) 8:386. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00386 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types