Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Jul 1;9(7):940-945.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0444.

Bacterial Decolonization for Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Bacterial Decolonization for Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Yana Kost et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: Evidence-based approaches for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) are limited, and additional strategies are necessary to optimize care.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of bacterial decolonization (BD) to reduce ARD severity compared with standard of care.

Design, setting, and participants: This phase 2/3 randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2019 to August 2021 with investigator blinding at an urban academic cancer center and enrolled patients with breast cancer or head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy (RT) with curative intent. Analysis was performed on January 7, 2022.

Interventions: Intranasal mupirocin ointment twice daily and chlorhexidine body cleanser once daily for 5 days prior to RT and repeated for 5 days every 2 weeks through RT.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome as planned prior to data collection was the development of grade 2 or higher ARD. Based on wide clinical variability of grade 2 ARD, this was refined to grade 2 ARD with moist desquamation (grade 2-MD).

Results: Of 123 patients assessed for eligibility via convenience sampling, 3 were excluded, and 40 refused to participate, with 80 patients in our final volunteer sample. Of 77 patients with cancer (75 patients with breast cancer [97.4%] and 2 patients with head and neck cancer [2.6%]) who completed RT, 39 were randomly assigned BC, and 38 were randomly assigned standard of care; the mean (SD) age of the patients was 59.9 (11.9) years, and 75 (97.4%) were female. Most patients were Black (33.7% [n = 26]) or Hispanic (32.5% [n = 25]). Among patients with breast cancer and patients with head and neck cancer (N = 77), none of the 39 patients treated with BD and 9 of the 38 patients (23.7%) treated with standard of care developed ARD grade 2-MD or higher (P = .001). Similar results were observed among the 75 patients with breast cancer (ie, none treated with BD and 8 [21.6%] receiving standard of care developed ARD grade ≥2-MD; P = .002). The mean (SD) ARD grade was significantly lower for patients treated with BD (1.2 [0.7]) compared with patients receiving standard of care (1.6 [0.8]) (P = .02). Of the 39 patients randomly assigned to BD, 27 (69.2%) reported regimen adherence, and only 1 patient (2.5%) experienced an adverse event related to BD (ie, itch).

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that BD is effective for ARD prophylaxis, specifically for patients with breast cancer.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03883828.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ohri reported receiving personal fees from Merck, AstraZeneca, and Genentech; grants from Merck; and grants from AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. Dr McLellan reported receiving personal fees from Laroche-Posay and Paula’s Choice, grants from Pfizer, nonfinancial support from Paxman, financial support for clinical trials run by OnQuality and Kintara, and royalties from UpToDate for reviewing the section on radiation dermatitis and authoring the section on hand-foot skin reaction from tyrosine kinase inhibitors. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Diagram
aFollow-up data could not be collected. bAcute radiation dermatitis scores after radiation therapy were extracted from the electronic medical record.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Bacterial Decolonization (BD) Efficacy and Effects on Acute Radiation Dermatitis
A, Incidence of moist desquamation in the BD group and the standard of care (SC) group. Grade 2-MD indicates grade 2 acute radiation dermatitis with moist desquamation. B, Staphylococcus aureus (SA) incidence in nares per treatment group before (P = .50) and after (P = .02) radiation therapy (RT).

Comment in

References

    1. Bryant AK, Banegas MP, Martinez ME, Mell LK, Murphy JD. Trends in radiation therapy among cancer survivors in the United States, 2000-2030. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(6):963-970. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-1023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rzepecki A, Birnbaum M, Ohri N, et al. . Characterizing the effects of radiation dermatitis on quality of life: a prospective survey-based study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(1):161-163. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.03.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lucey P, Zouzias C, Franco L, Chennupati SK, Kalnicki S, McLellan BN. Practice patterns for the prophylaxis and treatment of acute radiation dermatitis in the United States. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(9):2857-2862. doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3701-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kost Y, Rzepecki AK, Deutsch A, et al. Staphylococcus aureus colonization predicts severity of acute radiation dermatitis. JAMA Oncol. Published online May 4, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0454 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sakr A, Brégeon F, Mège JL, Rolain JM, Blin O. Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization: an update on mechanisms, epidemiology, risk factors, and subsequent infections. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2419. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02419 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data