Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 4:12:e44066.
doi: 10.2196/44066.

Adoption of mHealth Technologies by Community Health Workers to Improve the Use of Maternal Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: Protocol for a Mixed Method Systematic Review

Chiyembekezo Kachimanga  1   2 , Titus H Divala  3 , Johannes C F Ket  1 , Alexandra V Kulinkina  2   4   5 , Haules R Zaniku  3   6 , Joia Murkherjee  7 , Daniel Palazuelos  7 , Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde  8   9 , Thomas van den Akker  1
Affiliations

Adoption of mHealth Technologies by Community Health Workers to Improve the Use of Maternal Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: Protocol for a Mixed Method Systematic Review

Chiyembekezo Kachimanga et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that mobile health technologies (mHealth) enhance the use of maternal health services. However, there is limited evidence of the impact of mHealth use by community health workers (CHWs) on the use of maternal health services in sub-Saharan Africa.

Objective: This mixed method systematic review will explore the impact of mHealth use by CHWs on the use of the maternal health continuum of care (antenatal care, intrapartum care, and postnatal care [PNC]), as well as barriers and facilitators of mHealth use by CHWs when supporting maternal health services.

Methods: We will include studies that report the impact of mHealth by CHWs on the use of antenatal care, facility-based births, and PNC visits in sub-Saharan Africa. We will search 6 databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Africa Index Medicus), with additional articles identified from Google Scholar and manual screening of references of the included studies. The included studies will not be limited by language or year of publication. After study selection, 2 independent reviewers will perform title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening to identify the final papers to be included. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment will be performed using Covidence software by 2 independent reviewers. We will use a Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to perform risk-of-bias assessments on all included studies. Finally, we will perform a narrative synthesis of the outcomes, integrating information about the effect of mHealth on maternal health use and barriers and facilitators of mHealth use. This protocol follows the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols) guidelines.

Results: In September 2022, we conducted an initial search in the eligible databases. After removing duplicates, we identified 1111 studies that were eligible for the title and abstract screening. We will finalize the full-text assessment for eligibility, data extraction, assessment of methodological quality, and narrative synthesis by June 2023.

Conclusions: This systematic review will present new and up-to-date evidence on the use of mHealth by CHWs along the pregnancy, childbirth, and PNC continuum of care. We anticipate the results will inform program implementation and policy by highlighting the potential impacts of mHealth and presenting contextual factors that should be addressed to ensure the success of the programs.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42022346364; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=346364.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/44066.

Keywords: antenatal; community health worker; gynecology; health care provider; health care worker; health worker; mHealth; maternal; maternal health; maternity; mobile health; narrative synthesis; post natal; review method; sub-Saharan Africa; systematic review; women's health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Data extraction tool. CHW: community health workers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Socio-technical analysis framework.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Geller SE, Koch AR, Garland CE, MacDonald EJ, Storey F, Lawton B. A global view of severe maternal morbidity: moving beyond maternal mortality. Reprod Health. 2018 Jun 22;15(Suppl 1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0527-2. https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s... 10.1186/s12978-018-0527-2 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bongaarts J. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group, and United Nations Population Division Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2015 Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015. Population and Development Review. 2016 Dec 20;42(4):726–726. doi: 10.1111/padr.12033. - DOI
    1. Population, total - Sub-Saharan Africa, World. World Bank. 2022. [2022-09-25]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?end=2021&locations=ZG-1... .
    1. Musarandega R, Nyakura M, Machekano R, Pattinson R, Munjanja SP. Causes of maternal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review of studies published from 2015 to 2020. J Glob Health. 2021;11:04048. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04048. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/34737857 jogh-11-04048 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merdad L, Ali MM. Timing of maternal death: Levels, trends, and ecological correlates using sibling data from 34 sub-Saharan African countries. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0189416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189416. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189416 PONE-D-17-18786 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources