Artificial Intelligence Tools in Scholarly Publishing: Guidance for Academic Medicine Authors
- PMID: 37141465
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005261
Artificial Intelligence Tools in Scholarly Publishing: Guidance for Academic Medicine Authors
References
-
- Thorp HH. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. 2023;379:313.
-
- Flanagin A, Bibbins-Domingo K, Berkwits M, Christiansen SL. Nonhuman “authors” and implications for the integrity of scientific publication and medical knowledge. JAMA. 2023;329:637–639.
-
- [No authors listed.]. Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature. 2023;613:612.
-
- Committee on Publication Ethics. Authorship and AI Tools: COPE Position Statement. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author . Published February 13, 2023. Accessed April 18, 2023.
-
- Zielinski C, Winker M, Aggarwal R, et al. Chatbots, ChatGPT, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on ChatGPT and Chatbots in relation to scholarly publications. World Association of Medical Editors. https://wame.org/page3.php?id=106 . Published January 20, 2023. Accessed April 18, 2023.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources