Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 2;7(5):e22.00169.
doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00169. eCollection 2023 May 1.

Critical Review of Oncologic Medical Malpractice Claims Against Orthopaedic Surgeons

William Davis  1 , Shravya Kichena, Michael D Eckhoff, Benjamin R Childs, Rajiv Rajani, Matthew E Wells, Sean P Kelly
Affiliations
Review

Critical Review of Oncologic Medical Malpractice Claims Against Orthopaedic Surgeons

William Davis et al. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. .

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the most common allegations for malpractice litigation brought against orthopaedic surgeons for oncologic matters and the resulting verdicts.

Methods: The Westlaw Legal research database was queried for malpractice cases filed against orthopaedic surgeons for oncologic matters in the United States after 1980. Plaintiff demographics, state of filing, allegations, and outcomes of lawsuits were recorded and reported accordingly.

Results: A total of 36 cases met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were subsequently included in the final analysis. The overall rate of cases filed remained consistent through the past four decades and was primarily related to a primary sarcoma diagnosis in adult women. The primary reason for litigation was failure to diagnose a primary malignant sarcoma (42%) followed by failure to diagnose unrelated carcinoma (19%). The most common states of filing were primarily located in the Northeast (47%), where a plaintiff verdict was also more commonly encountered as compared with other regions. Damages awarded averaged $1,672,500 with a range of $134, 231 to $6,250,000 and a median of $918,750.

Conclusion: Failure to diagnose primary malignant sarcoma and unrelated carcinoma was the most common reason for oncologic litigation brought against orthopaedic surgeons. Although most of the cases ruled in favor of the defendant surgeon, it is important for orthopaedic surgeons to be aware of the potential errors that not only prevent litigation but also improve patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of case selection and stages of inclusion and exclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram showing geographic distinction in oncology-related malpractice claims filed against orthopaedic surgeons.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bal SB: An introduction to medical malpractice in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:339-347. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crawford LS: Why winners win: Decision making in medical malpractice cases. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;15:S70-S74. - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer J Clinicians 2022;72:7-33. - PubMed
    1. Browner BD: Skeletal trauma: basic science, management, and reconstruction, ed 6. Netherlands, Elsevier, 2019.
    1. Shah KN, Eltorai AEM, Perera S, et al. : Medical malpractice litigation following arthroscopic surgery. Arthrosc J Arthroscopic Relat Surg 2018;34:2236-2244. - PubMed