Impact of prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) score on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at biopsy
- PMID: 37141845
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110849
Impact of prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) score on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at biopsy
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the impact of Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) scores on the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in a targeted biopsy cohort.
Patients and methods: 300 patients who underwent both mpMRI and biopsy were included. PI-QUAL scores were retrospectively assigned by two radiologists in consensus and were correlated to pre-biopsy PI-RADS scores and biopsy outcomes. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as ISUP grade ≥ 2.
Results: Image quality was optimal (PI-QUAL ≥ 4) in 249/300 (83%) and suboptimal (PI-QUAL < 4) in 51/300 (17%). The proportion of PI-RADS 3 scores referred for biopsy was higher in scans of suboptimal vs optimal quality (51% vs 33%). For PI-QUAL < 4 scans, the positive predictive value (PPV) was lower compared to PI-QUAL ≥ 4 (35% [95%CI: 22, 48] vs 48% [95%CI: 41, 55]; difference -13% [95%CI: -27, 2]; p 0.090), as was the detection rate of csPCa in both PI-RADS 3 and PI-RADS 4-5 (15% vs 23% and 56 vs 63%, respectively). The overall MRI quality increased over time.
Conclusions: Scan quality may affect the diagnostic performance of prostate mpMRI in patients undergoing MRI-guided biopsy. Scans of suboptimal quality (PI-QUAL < 4) were associated with lower PPV for csPCa.
Keywords: Image quality; MRI of the prostate; PI-QUAL; Prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous