Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 1;117(2):446-451.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.027. Epub 2023 May 2.

A Prospective Study of Radiation Therapy After Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction: Analysis of the Dosimetric Implications

Affiliations

A Prospective Study of Radiation Therapy After Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction: Analysis of the Dosimetric Implications

Daphna Y Spiegel et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) are the primary causes of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is a novel surgical procedure that reduces the incidence of BCRL after ALND. The ILR anastomosis is placed in a location thought to be outside the standard radiation therapy fields to prevent radiation-induced fibrosis of the reconstructed vessels; however, there is excess risk of BCRL from RNI even after ILR. The purpose of this study was to understand the radiation dose distribution in relation to the ILR anastomosis.

Methods and materials: This prospective study included 13 patients treated with ALND/ILR from October 2020 to June 2022. A twirl clip deployed during surgery was used to identify the ILR anastomosis site during radiation treatment planning. All cases were planned using a 3D-conformal technique with opposed tangents and an obliqued supraclavicular (SCV) field.

Results: RNI deliberately targeted axillary Levels 1 to 3 and the SCV nodal region in 4 patients and was limited to Level 3 and SCV nodes in 9 patients. The ILR clip was located in Level 1 in 12 patients and Level 2 in 1 patient. In patients with radiation directed at only Level 3 and SCV, the ILR clip was still within the radiation field in 5 of these patients and received a median dose of 3939 cGy (range, 2025-4961 cGy). The median dose to the ILR clip was 3939 cGy (range, 139-4961 cGy) for the entire cohort. The median dose was 4275 cGy (range, 2025-4961 cGy) when the ILR clip was within any radiation field and 233 cGy (range, 139-280 cGy) when the clip was outside all fields.

Conclusion: The ILR anastomosis was often directly irradiated with 3D-conformal techniques and received substantial radiation dose, even when the site was not deliberately targeted. Long-term analysis will help determine whether minimizing radiation dose to the anastomosis will decrease BCRL rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Intraoperative images during immediate lymphatic reconstruction. (A) Intraoperative photo demonstrating an arm lymphatic channel (white arrow) fluorescing. The arm lymphatic has been placed into the recipient vein (red arrow). Sutures seal the lymphatic channel into the vein. (B) After completion of the anastomosis, a twirl clip is placed at the site of anastomosis and secured before fat graft placement.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Radiation dose at the site of the immediate lymphatic reconstruction anastomosis.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Beam arrangement and dose distribution relative to the immediate lymphatic reconstruction site. Axial, sagittal, and coronal computed tomography images of radiation beam arrangements relative to the ILR site in a representative patient. This patient had the right breast, axillary Level 3, and the supraclavicular region targeted. The immediate lymphatic reconstruction clip at the site of the anastomosis is contoured in lavender and highlighted by the white arrow.

Comment in

References

    1. DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:500–515. - PubMed
    1. Boccardo F, Casabona F, De Cian F, et al. Lymphedema microsurgical preventive healing approach: A new technique for primary prevention of arm lymphedema after mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:703–708. - PubMed
    1. Boccardo F, Casabona F, DeCian F, et al. Lymphatic microsurgical preventing healing approach (LYMPHA) for primary surgical prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema: Over 4 years follow-up. Microsurgery 2014;34:421–424. - PubMed
    1. Johnson AR, Kimball S, Epstein S, et al. Lymphedema incidence after axillary lymph node dissection: Quantifying the impact of radiation and the lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach. Ann Plast Surg 2019;82:S234. - PubMed
    1. Johnson AR, Fleishman A, Granoff MD, et al. Evaluating the impact of immediate lymphatic reconstruction for the surgical prevention of lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;147:373e. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources