Patients' perceptions on clinical trials outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy
- PMID: 37142420
- DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219490
Patients' perceptions on clinical trials outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy
Abstract
The value placed by patients and their caregivers on the components of composite outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains unknown. We surveyed the importance of these outcomes from a patients' and caregivers' perspective, with participants (n=335, including 257 patients with PAH) rating individual components defining clinical worsening in PAH trials as of critical, major, mild-to-moderate or minor importance. Most outcomes were considered of major or mild-to-moderate importance to patients. Death was the only outcome considered of critical importance. Perceptions of clinical outcomes varied between patients and caregivers. Integrating patients' perception in the elaboration of clinical trials is essential.
Keywords: Clinical Epidemiology; Primary Pulmonary Hypertension.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: JW reports speaker’s fees from Actelion, Janssen and Bayer; grants from Ac-telion, Janssen and Merck; and travel support from Janssen and Actelion. SB reports speaker’s fees from Actelion, Janssen and Morphic; and grants from Janssen and Morphic. SP reports grants from Janssen, grants from AstraZeneca, grants from Resverlogix, outside the submitted work and speaker’s fees from Janssen. The other authors report no conflicts.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources