Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 4;23(1):317.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05595-5.

Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries following breech compared to cephalic vaginal births

Perrine Leborne  1 , Renaud de Tayrac  2 , Zakarya Zemmache  3 , Chris Serrand  3 , Pascale Fabbro-Peray  3 , Lucie Allegre  2 , Emmanuelle Vintejoux  4
Affiliations

Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries following breech compared to cephalic vaginal births

Perrine Leborne et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Introduction: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) at the time of childbirth can lead to serious consequences including anal incontinence, dyspareunia, pain and rectovaginal fistula. These types of lesions and their incidence have been well studied after cephalic presentation deliveries, but no publications have specifically addressed this issue in the context of vaginal breech delivery. The goal of our study was to evaluate the incidence of OASIs following breech deliveries and compare it with cephalic presentation births.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study involving 670 women. Of these, 224 and 446 had a vaginal birth of a fetus in the breech (breech group) and cephalic (cephalic group) presentations respectively. Both groups were matched for birthweight (± 200 g), date of delivery (± 2 years) and vaginal parity. Main outcome of interest was to evaluate the incidence of OASIs following breech vaginal birth compared to cephalic vaginal births. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of intact perineum or first-degree tear, second-degree perineal tear and rates of episiotomies in each group.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in OASIs incidence between the breech and cephalic groups (0.9% vs. 1.1%; RR 0.802 (0.157; 4.101); p = 0.31). There were more episiotomies in the breech group (12.5% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.0012) and the rate of intact or first-degree perineum was similar in both groups (74.1% vs. 75.3%, p = 0.7291). A sub-analysis excluding patients with episiotomy and history of OASIs did not show any statistically significant difference either.

Conclusion: We did not demonstrate a significant difference in the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries between women who had a breech vaginal birth compared to cephalic.

Keywords: Breech delivery; OASI; OASIs; Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries; Pelvic floor; Perineal injuries; Perineum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS). : Prevention, Recognition, and Repair - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. https://www.jogc.com/article/S1701-2163(16)30081-0/fulltext (accessed August 13, 2021). - PubMed
    1. Pizzoferrato A-C, Samie M, Rousseau A, Rozenberg P, Fauconnier A, Bader G. [Severe post-obstetric perineal tears: medium-term consequences on women’s quality of life] Progres En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol. 2015;25:530–5. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2015.04.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lésions obstétricales du sphincter anal (LOSA). : Prévention, identification et réparation - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. https://www.jogc.com/article/S1701-2163(16)39700-6/fulltext (accessed August 11, 2021). - PubMed
    1. Sultan AH, Kettle C. Diagnosis of Perineal Trauma. In: Sultan AH, Thakar R, Fenner DE, editors. Perineal anal sphincter trauma Diagn. Clin. Manag. London: Springer; 2007. pp. 13–9.
    1. Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2005;34:513. doi: 10.1016/S0368-2315(05)82867-4. - DOI - PubMed