Massive Transfusion Protocol Adherence: Relationship to Trauma Patient Outcomes
- PMID: 37144807
- DOI: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000722
Massive Transfusion Protocol Adherence: Relationship to Trauma Patient Outcomes
Abstract
Background: Ongoing evaluation of massive transfusion protocol adherence is critical to ensure better trauma patient outcomes.
Objective: This quality improvement initiative aimed to determine provider adherence to a recently revised massive transfusion protocol and its relationship to clinical outcomes among trauma patients requiring massive transfusion.
Methods: A retrospective, descriptive, correlational design was used to determine the association between provider adherence to a recently revised massive transfusion protocol and clinical outcomes in trauma patients with hemorrhage treated at a Level I trauma center from November 2018 to October 2020. Patient characteristics, provider massive transfusion protocol adherence, and patient outcomes were assessed. Patient characteristics and massive transfusion protocol adherence associations with 24-hr survival and survival to discharge were determined using bivariate statistical methods.
Results: A total of 95 trauma patients with massive transfusion protocol activation were evaluated. Of the 95, 71 (75%) survived the initial 24 hr following massive transfusion protocol activation and 65 (68%) survived to discharge. Based on protocol applicable items, the median massive transfusion protocol overall adherence rate per patient was 75% (IQR = 57.1-85.7) for the 65 survivors and 25% (IQR = 12.5-50.0) for the 21 nonsurvivors to discharge whose death occurred at least 1 hr after massive transfusion protocol activation (p < .001).
Conclusion: Findings indicate the importance of ongoing evaluations of adherence to massive transfusion protocols in hospital trauma settings to target areas for improvement.
Copyright © 2023 Society of Trauma Nurses.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest or funding to declare.
References
-
- American College of Surgeons. (2014). Trauma quality improvement program: Massive transfusion in trauma guidelines. https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/quality-programs/trauma/tqip/transfus...
-
- Ansari S., Fung K., MacNeil S. D., Nichols A. C., Yoo J., Sowerby L. J. (2018). The use of standardized order sets to improve adherence to evidence-based postoperative management in major head and neck surgery. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases, 135(5S), S107–S111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2018.08.009 - DOI
-
- Baksaas-Aasen K., Gall L. S., Stensballe J., Juffermans N. P., Curry N., Maegele M., Brooks A., Rourke C., Gillespie S., Murphy J., Maroni R., Vulliamy P., Henriksen H. H., Holst Pedersen K., Kolstadbraaten K. M., Wirtz M. R., Kleinveld D. J. B., Shäfer N., Chinna S., Brohi K. (2021). Viscoelastic haemostatic assay augmented protocols for major trauma haemorrhage (ITACTIC): A randomized, controlled trial. Intensive Care Medicine, 47(1), 49–59. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06266-1 - DOI
-
- Bawazeer M., Ahmed N., Izadi H., McFarlan A., Nathens A., Pavenski K. (2015). Compliance with a massive transfusion protocol (MTP) impacts patient outcome. Injury, 46(1), 21–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.09.020 - DOI
-
- Brennan P. M., Murray G. D., Teasdale G. M. (2018). Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 1: The GCS-Pupil score: An extended index of clinical severity. Journal of Neurosurgery, 128(6), 1612–1620. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.12.JNS172780 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical