Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;37(7):1530-1539.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-01910-3. Epub 2023 May 5.

Assessment and validation of the molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes

Affiliations

Assessment and validation of the molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes

Luis E Aguirre et al. Leukemia. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

The Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) is a novel risk stratification model for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) that builds on the IPSS and IPSS-R by incorporating mutational data. The model showed improved prognostic accuracy over the IPSS-R across three endpoints: overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and leukemic transformation. This study aimed to validate the findings of the original in a large cohort of MDS patients, as well as assess its validity in therapy-related and hypoplastic MDS. We retrospectively reviewed clinical, cytogenetic and molecular data for 2355 MDS patients treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center. Correlative analysis between IPSS-R and mean IPSS-M scores and outcome predictions was performed on LFS, OS and leukemic transformation. Using the IPSS-M, patients were classified as Very Low (4%), Low (24%), Moderate-Low (14%), Moderate-High (11%), High (19%) and Very-High risk (28%). Median OS was 11.7, 7.1, 4.4, 3.1, 2.3, and 1.3 years from VL to VH risk subgroups. Median LFS was 12.3, 6.9, 3.6, 2.2, 1.4, and 0.5 years respectively. For patients with t-MDS and h-MDS the model retained its prognostic accuracy. Generalized use of this tool will likely result in more accurate prognostic assessment and optimize therapeutic decision-making in MDS.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aguirre LE, Komrokji R, Padron E. It is time to shift the treatment paradigm in myelodysplastic syndromes: A focus on novel developments and current investigational approaches exploring combinatorial therapy in high-risk MDS. Best Pr Res Clin Haematol. 2021;34:101325. - DOI
    1. Ogawa S. Genetics of MDS. Blood. 2019;133:1049–59. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, Fenaux P, Morel P, Sanz G, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 1997;89:2079–88. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Solé F, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012;120:2454–65. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bejar R. Clinical and genetic predictors of prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica 2014;99:956–64. - DOI - PubMed - PMC