Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 5;18(1):106.
doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02719-0.

A systematic overview of rare disease patient registries: challenges in design, quality management, and maintenance

Affiliations
Review

A systematic overview of rare disease patient registries: challenges in design, quality management, and maintenance

Isabel C Hageman et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. .

Abstract

Patient registries serve to overcome the research limitations inherent in the study of rare diseases, where patient numbers are typically small. Despite the value of real-world data collected through registries, adequate design and maintenance are integral to data quality. We aimed to describe an overview of the challenges in design, quality management, and maintenance of rare disease registries.A systematic search of English articles was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Medline/Embase, and Cochrane Library. Search terms included "rare diseases, patient registries, common data elements, quality, hospital information systems, and datasets". Inclusion criteria were any manuscript type focused upon rare disease patient registries describing design, quality monitoring or maintenance. Biobanks and drug surveillances were excluded.A total of 37 articles, published between 2001 and 2021, met the inclusion criteria. Patient registries covered a wide range of disease areas and covered multiple geographical locations, with a predisposition for Europe. Most articles were methodological reports and described the design and setup of a registry. Most registries recruited clinical patients (92%) with informed consent (81%) and protected the collected data (76%). Whilst the majority (57%) collected patient-reported outcome measures, only few (38%) consulted PAGs during the registry design process. Few reports described details regarding quality management (51%) and maintenance (46%).Rare disease patient registries are valuable for research and evaluation of clinical care, and an increasing number have emerged. However, registries need to be continuously evaluated for data quality and long-term sustainability to remain relevant for future use.

Keywords: Data quality; Design; Maintenance; Patient registry; Rare disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Geographical coverage of included registries
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Countries of coordinating entities of included registries

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gliklich RE, Leavy MB, Dreyer NA. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. Rockville, MD, United States: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) September 2020. Report No.: 19(20)-EHC020. - PubMed
    1. Orphanet. Rare Disease Registries in Europe. 2021. Available from: http://www.orpha.net/orphacom/cahiers/docs/GB/Registries.pdf.
    1. European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases: Recommendations on European Reference Networks for rare diseases, European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases; 2013. Available from: https://health.ec.europa.eu/publications/eucerd-core-recommendations-rar....
    1. Kodra Y, Posada de la Paz M, Coi A, Santoro M, Bianchi F, Ahmed F, et al. Data Quality in Rare Diseases Registries. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1031:149–64. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cavero-Carbonell C, Gras-Colomer E, Guaita-Calatrava R, López-Briones C, Amorós R, Abaitua I, et al. Consensus on the criteria needed for creating a rare-disease patient registry. A Delphi study. J Public Health. 2015;38(2):e178–e86. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv099. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types