Patients' Experiences With the Removal of a Ureteral Stent: Insights From In-depth Interviews With Participants in the USDRN STENTS Qualitative Cohort Study
- PMID: 37149059
- PMCID: PMC10530092
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.018
Patients' Experiences With the Removal of a Ureteral Stent: Insights From In-depth Interviews With Participants in the USDRN STENTS Qualitative Cohort Study
Abstract
Objective: To describe the experiences of patients undergoing stent removal in the USDRN Study to Enhance Understanding of Stent-Associated Symptoms (STENTS), a prospective, observational cohort study of patients with short-term ureteral stent placement post-ureteroscopy.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using in-depth interviews. Participants reflected on (1) painful or bothersome aspects of stent removal, (2) symptoms immediately after removal, and (3) symptoms in the days following removal. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using applied thematic analysis.
Results: The 38 participants interviewed were aged 13-77 years, 55% female, and 95% White. Interviews were conducted 7-30 days after stent removal. Almost all participants (n = 31) described that they experienced either pain or discomfort during stent removal, but for most (n = 25) pain was of short duration. Many participants (n = 21) described anticipatory anxiety related to the procedure, and several (n = 11) discussed discomfort arising from lack of privacy or feeling exposed. Interactions with medical providers often helped put participants at ease, but also increased discomfort for some. Following stent removal, several participants described lingering pain and/or urinary symptoms, but these largely resolved within 24 hours. A few participants described symptoms persisting for more than a day post stent removal.
Conclusion: These findings on patients' experiences during and shortly after ureteral stent removal, particularly the psychological distress they experienced, identify opportunities for improvement in patient care. Clear communication from providers about what to expect with the removal procedure, and the possibility of delayed pain, may help patients adapt to discomfort.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest Carrie Dombeck: No conflict; Charles D Scales Jr: study funding NIDDK; Kevin McKenna: No conflict; Teresa Swezey: No conflict; Jonathan D. Harper: study funding NIDDK; Jodi A. Antonelli: study funding NIDDK; Alana C. Desai: study funding NIDDK; Rebecca McCune: study funding NIDDK; H. Henry Lai: study funding NIDDK; Michele Curatolo: study funding NIDDK; Hussein R. Al-Khalidi: study funding NIDDK; Peter P. Reese: study funding NIDDK; Hunter Wessells: study funding NIDDK; Ziya Kirkali: no conflicts; Amy Corneli: study funding NIDDK.
References
-
- Leibovici D, Cooper A, Lindner A, et al. Ureteral Stents: Morbidity and Impact on Quality of Life. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005. Aug;7(8):491–4. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
