Bioprinting: A focus on improving bioink printability and cell performance based on different process parameters
- PMID: 37149110
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123020
Bioprinting: A focus on improving bioink printability and cell performance based on different process parameters
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an emerging biofabrication technique that shows great potential in the field of tissue engineering, regenerative medicine and advanced drug delivery. Despite the current advancement of bioprinting technology, it faces several obstacles such as the challenge of optimizing the printing resolution of 3D constructs while retaining cell viability before, during, and after bioprinting. Therefore, it is of great significance to fully understand factors that influence the shape fidelity of printed structures and the performance of cells encapsulated in bioinks. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of bioprinting process parameters that influence bioink printability and cell performance, including bioink properties (composition, concentration, and component ratio), printing speed and pressure, nozzle characteristics (size, length, and geometry), and crosslinking parameters (crosslinker types, concentration, and crosslinking time). Key examples are provided to analyze how these parameters could be tailored to achieve the optimal printing resolution as well as cell performance. Finally, future prospects of bioprinting technology, including correlation between process parameters and particular cell types with predefined applications, applying statistical analysis and artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) technique in parameter screening, and optimizing four-dimensional (4D) bioprinting process parameters, are highlighted.
Keywords: Bioink; Bioprinting; Cell performance; Printability; Printing parameters.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells.Biofabrication. 2016 Sep 16;8(3):035020. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020. Biofabrication. 2016. PMID: 27634915
-
Advancing bioinks for 3D bioprinting using reactive fillers: A review.Acta Biomater. 2020 Sep 1;113:1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Jul 2. Acta Biomater. 2020. PMID: 32622053 Review.
-
Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.Tissue Eng Part A. 2020 Mar;26(5-6):318-338. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0298. Tissue Eng Part A. 2020. PMID: 32079490 Free PMC article.
-
3D Bioprinting and Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Biofabrication of Personalized Oral Soft Tissue Constructs.Adv Healthc Mater. 2025 May;14(13):e2402727. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202402727. Epub 2024 Dec 17. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025. PMID: 39690752
-
Nanocomposite bioinks for 3D bioprinting.Acta Biomater. 2022 Oct 1;151:45-69. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.014. Epub 2022 Aug 13. Acta Biomater. 2022. PMID: 35970479 Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of the Methacrylation Process on the Usefulness of Chitosan as a Biomaterial Component for 3D Printing.J Funct Biomater. 2024 Aug 30;15(9):251. doi: 10.3390/jfb15090251. J Funct Biomater. 2024. PMID: 39330227 Free PMC article.
-
Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering: From Tissue Regeneration to Biorobotics.Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2025 May 15;6:0279. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0279. eCollection 2025. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2025. PMID: 40376483 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Harnessing the power of machine learning into tissue engineering: current progress and future prospects.Burns Trauma. 2024 Dec 6;12:tkae053. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkae053. eCollection 2024. Burns Trauma. 2024. PMID: 39659561 Free PMC article. Review.
-
AI-driven 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine: From bench to bedside.Bioact Mater. 2024 Nov 23;45:201-230. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.11.021. eCollection 2025 Mar. Bioact Mater. 2024. PMID: 39651398 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bioprinted Hydrogels as Vehicles for the Application of Extracellular Vesicles in Regenerative Medicine.Gels. 2025 Mar 8;11(3):191. doi: 10.3390/gels11030191. Gels. 2025. PMID: 40136896 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources