Injecting practices during and after hepatitis C treatment and associations with not achieving cure among persons who inject drugs
- PMID: 37150144
- DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109878
Injecting practices during and after hepatitis C treatment and associations with not achieving cure among persons who inject drugs
Abstract
Background: Persons who inject drugs (PWID) are a key population for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. Study aims were to describe injection practices of PWID during HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and assess whether injection practices were associated with not achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR).
Methods: Secondary analysis of the HERO Study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02824640), a pragmatic randomized trial in 8 U.S. states to evaluate the effectiveness of HCV care models among active PWID seen in opioid treatment programs and community clinics. Frequency, sharing and reuse of injecting equipment were assessed at baseline, end-of-treatment (EOT) and quarterly visits up to 60 weeks post-treatment. Generalized Estimating Equations logistic regression models with linear spline were used to compare trends in injecting behaviors during vs. post-treatment. Multivariable logistic regression models explored associations between injecting behaviors during treatment and lack of SVR.
Results: Among 501 participants, 27% were female, 35% were non-white, mean age was 44 (SD 11.5) years and nearly half (49%) were unhoused. At baseline, 41% reported receptive sharing of injecting equipment, declining to 16% at EOT visit. Receptive sharing of cookers, rinses, or needles/syringes during treatment was associated with a nearly 5-fold increase in not achieving SVR (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=4.83; 95% CI: 2.26, 10.28) as was reuse of one's own needles/syringes (aOR=2.37; 95% CI: 1.11, 4.92).
Conclusions: PWID in the HERO study adopted safer injecting behaviors during DAA treatment; receptive sharing of injecting equipment and reuse of one's own equipment during treatment were associated with not achieving cure.
Keywords: Antiviral therapy; Hepatitis C; Injection drug use; Sustained virologic response.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest FN has served on advisory panels for Gilead Sciences and reports research funds from AbbVie paid to Johns Hopkins University. JF has received research grant support from Gilead Sciences. AYK has served on advisory boards for Biomarin. AFL received research grant support from Gilead and Merck. The Task Force for Global Health receives funds for the general support of the Coalition for Global Hepatitis Elimination from Abbott, Gilead, AbbVie, Merck, Siemens, Roche, Pharco, Zydus-Cadila, governmental agencies, and philanthropic organizations. AHL has served on advisory boards for Gilead Sciences and Merck Pharmaceuticals and received research funding from Gilead Sciences. Dr. Mehta has received speaker fees from Gilead Sciences. LT has received UpToDate Royalties for peer review of viral hepatitis topics. All other authors had nothing to disclose.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical