Machine learning derived echocardiographic image quality in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: insights on the echo views of greatest image quality
- PMID: 37150757
- DOI: 10.1007/s10554-023-02802-4
Machine learning derived echocardiographic image quality in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: insights on the echo views of greatest image quality
Abstract
We sought to determine the cardiac ultrasound view of greatest quality using a machine learning (ML) approach on a cohort of transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE) with abnormal left ventricular (LV) systolic function. We utilize an ML model to determine the TTE view of highest quality when scanned by sonographers. A random sample of TTEs with reported LV dysfunction from 09/25/2017-01/15/2019 were downloaded from the regional database. Component video files were analyzed using ML models that jointly classified view and image quality. The model consisted of convolutional layers for extracting spatial features and Long Short-term Memory units to temporally aggregate the frame-wise spatial embeddings. We report the view-specific quality scores for each TTE. Pair-wise comparisons amongst views were performed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Of 1,145 TTEs analyzed by the ML model, 74.5% were from males and mean LV ejection fraction was 43.1 ± 9.9%. Maximum quality score was best for the apical 4 chamber (AP4) view (70.6 ± 13.9%, p<0.001 compared to all other views) and worst for the apical 2 chamber (AP2) view (60.4 ± 15.4%, p<0.001 for all views except parasternal short-axis view at mitral/papillary muscle level, PSAX M/PM). In TTEs scanned by professional sonographers, the view with greatest ML-derived quality was the AP4 view.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Cardiac ultrasound; Echocardiography; Image quality; Machine learning.
© 2023. Crown.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction by single echocardiographic view: towards an evidence-based point of care cardiac ultrasound scanning protocol.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Apr;38(4):751-758. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02460-4. Epub 2021 Nov 2. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022. PMID: 34727254 Free PMC article.
-
Automated estimation of echocardiogram image quality in hospitalized patients.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan;37(1):229-239. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01981-8. Epub 2020 Nov 19. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021. PMID: 33211237
-
A machine learning algorithm supports ultrasound-naïve novices in the acquisition of diagnostic echocardiography loops and provides accurate estimation of LVEF.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Feb;37(2):577-586. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02046-6. Epub 2020 Oct 8. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021. PMID: 33029699 Free PMC article.
-
The apical long-axis rather than the two-chamber view should be used in combination with the four-chamber view for accurate assessment of left ventricular volumes and function.Eur Heart J. 1997 Jul;18(7):1175-85. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015414. Eur Heart J. 1997. PMID: 9243153
-
Directed bedside transthoracic echocardiography: preferred cardiac window for left ventricular ejection fraction estimation in critically ill patients.Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;25(8):894-900. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.01.023. Am J Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 17920973
Cited by
-
Development of artificial intelligence-based slow-motion echocardiography and clinical usefulness for evaluating regional wall motion abnormalities.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Feb;40(2):385-395. doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02997-6. Epub 2023 Nov 8. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024. PMID: 37940734
References
-
- Johri AM, Durbin J, Newbigging J, Tanzola R, Chow R, De S, Tam J (2018) Committee CSoECPoCU: Cardiac Point-of-care Ultrasound: state of the art in Medical School Education.J Am Soc Echocardiogr
-
- Haskins SC, Bronshteyn Y, Perlas A, El-Boghdadly K, Zimmerman J, Silva M, Boretsky K, Chan V, Kruisselbrink R, Byrne M et al (2021) : American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine expert panel recommendations on point-of-care ultrasound education and training for regional anesthesiologists and pain physicians-part I: clinical indications.Reg Anesth Pain Med
-
- Haskins SC, Bronshteyn Y, Perlas A, El-Boghdadly K, Zimmerman J, Silva M, Boretsky K, Chan V, Kruisselbrink R, Byrne M et al American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine expert panel recommendations on point-of-care ultrasound education and training for regional anesthesiologists and pain physicians—part II: recommendations.Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine2021:rapm-2021-10256
-
- Lambrecht JE, Zhang K, Tierney DM, Millner P, Giovannini D, Barron K, Novak W, Patel SA, Dversdal R, Cox EJ, Lopresti CM (2021) : Integration of point of Care Ultrasound Education into the Internal Medicine Core Clerkship Experience.Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials