Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1986 Apr;81(4):237-42.

[Sterility of tubal origin: microsurgery and fertilization in vitro]

[Article in French]
  • PMID: 3715308
Comparative Study

[Sterility of tubal origin: microsurgery and fertilization in vitro]

[Article in French]
A Bremond et al. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Apr.

Abstract

Thanks to recent advances, in-vitro fertilization should alter the clinical indications in cases of sterility due to tubar obstruction. In this article, the authors compare two groups of patients: one group of 109 women treated by means of in-vitro fertilization and another group of 117, treated by microsurgery. In tubar sterility, IVF achieved a 16% pregnancy rate per attempt. In the case of microsurgery, the actuarial rates were calculated (Kaplan Meier method) from a prognostic score. It was found that in the group of women with a "good score", tubar surgery gave results which could be achieved only after 3 or 4 attempts at IVF. On the other hand, in the "poor prognosis" group, IVF was better than microsurgery after a single attempt. Clinical teams should, therefore, reconsider the indications for tubar surgery in the light of the indications for in-vitro fertilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources