Background, techniques, applications, current trends, and future directions of minimally invasive endoscopic spine surgery: A review of literature
- PMID: 37155511
- PMCID: PMC10122780
- DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i4.197
Background, techniques, applications, current trends, and future directions of minimally invasive endoscopic spine surgery: A review of literature
Abstract
Across many of the surgical specialties, the use of minimally invasive techniques that utilize indirect visualization has been increasingly replacing traditional techniques which utilize direct visualization. Arthroscopic surgery of the appendicular skeleton has evolved dramatically and become an integral part of musculoskeletal surgery over the last several decades, allowing surgeons to achieve similar or better outcomes, while reducing cost and recovery time. However, to date, the axial skeleton, with its close proximity to critical neural and vascular structures, has not adopted endoscopic techniques at as rapid of a rate. Over the past decade, increased patient demand for less invasive spine surgery combined with surgeon desire to meet these demands has driven significant evolution and innovation in endoscopic spine surgery. In addition, there has been an enormous advancement in technologies that assist in navigation and automation that help surgeons circumvent limitations of direct visualization inherent to less invasive techniques. There are currently a multitude of endoscopic techniques and approaches that can be utilized in the treatment of spine disorders, many of which are evolving rapidly. Here we present a review of the field of endoscopic spine surgery, including the background, techniques, applications, current trends, and future directions, to help providers gain a better understanding of this growing modality in spine surgery.
Keywords: Applications; Endoscopic; Endoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Spine; Spine Surgery.
©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Figures



References
-
- Basil GW, Kumar V, Wang MY. Optimizing visualization in endoscopic spine surgery. Oper Neurosurg. 2021;15:S59–S66. - PubMed
-
- Yang Y, Liu ZY, Zhang LM, Pang M, Chhantyal K, Wu WB, Chen ZH, Luo CX, Rong LM, Liu B. Microendoscopy-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: 5-Year Outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:e602–e610. - PubMed
-
- Kolcun JPG, Brusko GD, Basil GW, Epstein R, Wang MY. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;46:E14. - PubMed
-
- Ahn Y, Youn MS, Heo DH. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comprehensive review. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16:373–380. - PubMed
-
- Kafadar A, Kahraman S, Akbörü M. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy: a critical appraisal. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2006;49:74–79. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous