Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 1;43(8):1308-1316.
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003832.

EVALUATION OF THE INCLUSION OF SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN A TELEMEDICINE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY SCREENING PROGRAM: A Real Clinical Practice

Affiliations

EVALUATION OF THE INCLUSION OF SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN A TELEMEDICINE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY SCREENING PROGRAM: A Real Clinical Practice

Carolina Arruabarrena et al. Retina. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether combining spectral domain optical coherence tomography with monoscopic fundus photography using a nonmydriatic camera (MFP-NMC) improves the accuracy of diabetic macular edema (DME) referrals in a teleophthalmology diabetic retinopathy screening program.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study with all diabetic patients aged 18 years or older who attended screening from September 2016 to December 2017. We assessed DME according to the three MFP-NMC and the four spectral domain optical coherence tomography criteria. The sensitivity and specificity obtained for each criterion were estimated by comparing them with the ground truth of DME.

Results: This study included 3,918 eyes (1,925 patients; median age, 66 years; interquartile range, 58-73; females, 40.7%; once-screened, 68.1%). The prevalence of DME ranged from 1.22% to 1.83% and 1.54% to 8.77% on MFP-NMC and spectral domain optical coherence tomography, respectively. Sensitivity barely reached 50% in MFP-NMC and less for the quantitative criteria of spectral domain optical coherence tomography. When macular thickening and anatomical signs of DME were considered, sensitivity increased to 88.3% and the false DMEs and non-gradable images were reduced.

Conclusion: Macular thickening and anatomical signs showed the highest suitability for screening, with a sensitivity of 88.3% and a specificity of 99.8%. Notably, MFP-NMC alone missed half of the true DMEs that lacked indirect signs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lovic D, Piperidou A, Zografou I, et al. The growing epidemic of diabetes mellitus. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2020;18:104–109.
    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes. 10th ed. Brussels: Atlas Press; 2021. Available at: https://diabetesatlas.org/ . Accessed June 28, 2022.
    1. Teo ZL, Tham YC, Yu M, et al. Global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and projection of burden through 2045: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2021;128:1580–1591.
    1. Fenner BJ, Wong RLM, Lam WC, et al. Advances in retinal imaging and applications in diabetic retinopathy screening: a review. Ophthalmol Ther 2018;7:333–346.
    1. Peto T, Tadros C. Screening for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema in the United Kingdom. Curr Diab Rep 2012;12:338–345.