Using quotients as a mentor to facilitate the success of underrepresented students
- PMID: 37156509
- PMCID: PMC10255757
- DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftad008
Using quotients as a mentor to facilitate the success of underrepresented students
Abstract
Choosing a mentor requires a certain level of introspection for both the mentor and the mentee. The dynamics of mentorship may change depending on the academic status of the mentee. Regardless, mentors should help their trainees grow both academically and professionally. The success of an individual in the fields of science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) depends on more than intellectual capacity; a holistic view encompassing all factors that contribute to scientific achievement is all-important. Specifically, one new method scientists can adopt is quotients, which are scales and techniques that can be used to measure aptitude in a specific area. In this paper, we focus on these factors and how to grow one's adversity quotient (AQ), social quotient (SQ), and personal growth initiative scale (PGIS). We also look at how mentors can better understand the biases of their trainees. In addressing this, mentors can help trainees become more visible and encourage other trainees to become allies through reducing biases.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; adversity/adaptability quotient; bias; mentorship; personal growth initiative scale; prejudice; social quotient.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Alotaibi SM, Amin M, Winterton J.. Does emotional intelligence and empowering leadership affect psychological empowerment and work engagement?. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2020;41:971–91.
-
- Bar-On R. The Emotional Intelligence Inventory (EQ-i): Technical Manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, 1997.
-
- Black SA. Qualities of effective leadership in higher education. Open J Leadersh. 2015;4:54.
-
- Blanton H, Jaccard J.. You can't assess the forest if you can't assess the trees: psychometric challenges to measuring implicit bias in crowds. Psycholog Inq. 2017;28:249–57.
