Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 8;13(5):e069212.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069212.

Evaluation of the reported data linkage process and associated quality issues for linked routinely collected healthcare data in multimorbidity research: a systematic methodology review

Maria Elstad  1 , Saiam Ahmed  2 , Jo Røislien  3 , Abdel Douiri  4
Affiliations

Evaluation of the reported data linkage process and associated quality issues for linked routinely collected healthcare data in multimorbidity research: a systematic methodology review

Maria Elstad et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to examine how the record linkage process is reported in multimorbidity research.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Web of Science and Embase using predefined search terms, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Published studies from 2010 to 2020 using linked routinely collected data for multimorbidity research were included. Information was extracted on how the linkage process was reported, which conditions were studied together, which data sources were used, as well as challenges encountered during the linkage process or with the linked dataset.

Results: Twenty studies were included. Fourteen studies received the linked dataset from a trusted third party. Eight studies reported variables used for the data linkage, while only two studies reported conducting prelinkage checks. The quality of the linkage was only reported by three studies, where two reported linkage rate and one raw linkage figures. Only one study checked for bias by comparing patient characteristics of linked and non-linked records.

Conclusions: The linkage process was poorly reported in multimorbidity research, even though this might introduce bias and potentially lead to inaccurate inferences drawn from the results. There is therefore a need for increased awareness of linkage bias and transparency of the linkage processes, which could be achieved through better adherence to reporting guidelines.

Prospero registration number: CRD42021243188.

Keywords: geriatric medicine; public health; statistics & research methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the paper selection process for studies into the review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, et al. . The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely-collected health data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001885. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Safran C. Using routinely collected data for clinical research. Stat Med 1991;10:559–64. 10.1002/sim.4780100407 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Coster C, Quan H, Finlayson A, et al. . Identifying priorities in methodological research using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data: report from an international consortium. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:77. 10.1186/1472-6963-6-77 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harron K, Goldstein H, Dibben C. Methodological developments in data linkage. Wiley, 2015.
    1. Sayers A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Blom AW, et al. . Probabilistic record linkage. Int J Epidemiol 2016;45:954–64. 10.1093/ije/dyv322 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources