Defining the incidence and management of postoperative scrotal hematoma after primary and complex three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery
- PMID: 37156930
- PMCID: PMC10166027
- DOI: 10.1038/s41443-023-00697-2
Defining the incidence and management of postoperative scrotal hematoma after primary and complex three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery
Abstract
Scrotal hematoma is a challenging complication of penile prosthesis surgery. We characterize the risk of hematoma formation with implementation of standardized techniques to mitigate hematomas and assess for any associated factors in a large multi-institutional penile implant cohort. This was a retrospective review from February 2018 to December 2020 of all patients who underwent inflatable penile prosthesis implantation at 2 high volume implant centers. Cases were defined as "complex" if they involved revision, salvage with removal/replacement, or were performed with concurrent penile, scrotal or intra-abdominal surgeries. The incidence of scrotal hematoma among primary and complex IPP recipients was measured and modifiable and innate risk factors associated with hematoma formation within the two cohorts were tracked. Of 246 men who underwent penile prosthesis surgery, 194 (78.9%) patients underwent primary implantation and 52 (21.1%) were complex. Although hematoma formers in the complex group had comparable drain outputs to primary patients on postoperative day 0 (66.8cc ± 32.5 vs 48.4 ± 27.7, p = 0.470) and postoperative day 1 (40.3cc ± 20.8vs 21.8 ± 11.3 p = 0.125), hematomas in the complex group had a higher propensity for OR evacuation (p = 0.03). Difference in duration of temporary device inflation between 2 (64, 26%) and 4 weeks (182, 74%) did not contribute to hematoma formation (p = 0.562). The incidence of postoperative hematoma formation in complex cases was 9.6% (5/52) and 3.6% in primary cases (7/194) (HR = 2.61, p = 0.072). Complex IPP surgery performed for revision or with ancillary procedures are more likely to result in clinically significant hematomas that require surgical management, suggesting a need for heightened caution in managing these individuals.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Consultants for Coloplast (JS and MG) and Boston Scientific (JS). Ethical approval: Approval by Einstein Medical Center’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) was granted prior to initiation of retrospective data collection.
References
-
- Chung E, Bettocchi C, Egydio P, Love C, Osmonov D, Park S, et al. The International Penile Prosthesis Implant Consensus Forum: clinical recommendations and surgical principles on the inflatable 3-piece penile prosthesis implant. Nat Rev Urol. 2022;19:534–46. 10.1038/s41585-022-00607-z. - PubMed
-
- Ohl DA, Brock G, Ralph D, Bogache W, Jones L, Munarriz R, et al. Prospective evaluation of patient satisfaction, and surgeon and patient trainer assessment of the coloplast titan one touch release three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2467–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02819.x. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical