Efficiency of mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci
- PMID: 37157025
- PMCID: PMC10313694
- DOI: 10.1038/s41437-023-00618-5
Efficiency of mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci
Abstract
Most theoretical studies on epistatic QTL mapping have shown that this procedure is powerful, efficient to control the false positive rate (FPR), and precise to localize QTLs. The objective of this simulation-based study was to show that mapping epistatic QTLs is not an almost-perfect process. We simulated 50 samples of 400 F2 plants/recombinant inbred lines, genotyped for 975 SNPs distributed in 10 chromosomes of 100 cM. The plants were phenotyped for grain yield, assuming 10 epistatic QTLs and 90 minor genes. Adopting basic procedures of r/qtl package, we maximized the power of detection for QTLs (56-74%, on average) but associated with a very high FPR (65%) and a low detection power for the epistatic pairs (7%). Increasing the average detection power for epistatic pairs (14%) highly increased the related FPR. Adopting a procedure to find the best balance between power and FPR, there was a significant decrease in the power of QTL detection (17-31%, on average), associated with a low average detection power for epistatic pairs (8%) and an average FPR of 31% for QTLs and 16% for epistatic pairs. The main reasons for these negative results are a simplified specification of the coefficients of epistatic effects, as theoretically proved, and the effects of minor genes since 2/3 of the FPR for QTLs were due to them. We hope that this study, including the partial derivation of the coefficients of epistatic effects, motivates investigations on how to increase the power of detection for epistatic pairs, effectively controlling the FPR.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Genetics Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Factors influencing QTL mapping accuracy under complicated genetic models by computer simulation.Genet Mol Res. 2016 Dec 19;15(4). doi: 10.4238/gmr15049153. Genet Mol Res. 2016. PMID: 28002599
-
Controlling false positives in the mapping of epistatic QTL.Heredity (Edinb). 2010 Apr;104(4):401-9. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.129. Epub 2009 Sep 30. Heredity (Edinb). 2010. PMID: 19789566
-
Genome-Wide Detection of Major and Epistatic Effect QTLs for Seed Protein and Oil Content in Soybean Under Multiple Environments Using High-Density Bin Map.Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 23;20(4):979. doi: 10.3390/ijms20040979. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 30813455 Free PMC article.
-
Mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci.BMC Genet. 2014 Nov 4;15:112. doi: 10.1186/s12863-014-0112-9. BMC Genet. 2014. PMID: 25367219 Free PMC article.
-
QTL-based evidence for the role of epistasis in evolution.Genet Res. 2005 Oct;86(2):89-95. doi: 10.1017/S0016672305007780. Genet Res. 2005. PMID: 16356282 Review.
Cited by
-
Discovery and validation of SSR marker-based QTL governing fresh pod yield in dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet).Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 12;15(1):8613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90558-3. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40075147 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison of Methods to Estimate Additive-by-Additive-by-Additive of QTL×QTL×QTL Interaction Effects by Monte Carlo Simulation Studies.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 12;24(12):10043. doi: 10.3390/ijms241210043. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37373191 Free PMC article.
-
A simulation-based assessment of the efficiency of QTL mapping under environment and genotype x environment interaction effects.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0295245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295245. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38033088 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Broman KW, Sen S (2009). A guide to QTL mapping with R/qtl. Springer
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous