Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 8;23(1):457.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09466-9.

Community engagement processes in low- and middle-income countries health research settings: a systematic review of the literature

Affiliations

Community engagement processes in low- and middle-income countries health research settings: a systematic review of the literature

Zinhle Mthembu et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Community Engagement is an important ethical imperative in research. Although substantial research emphasizes its real value and strategic importance, much of the available literature focuses primarily on the success of community participation, with little emphasis given to specific community engagement processes, mechanisms and strategies in relation to intended outcomes in research environments. The systematic literature review's objective was to explore the nature of community engagement processes, strategies and approaches in health research settings in low- and middle-income countries.

Methods: The systematic literature review design was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched for peer-reviewed, English-language literature published between January 2011 and December 2021 through three databases on the internet (PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar). The terms "community engagement," "community involvement," "participation," "research settings," and "low- and middle-income countries" were merged in the search.

Results: The majority of publications [8/10] were led by authors from low- and middle-income countries, with many of them, [9/10] failing to continuously include important aspects of study quality. Even though consultation and information sessions were less participatory, articles were most likely to describe community engagement in these types of events. The articles covered a wide range of health issues, but the majority were concerned with infectious diseases such as malaria, human immunodeficiency virus, and tuberculosis, followed by studies on the environment and broader health factors. Articles were largely under-theorized.

Conclusions: Despite the lack of theoretical underpinnings for various community engagement processes, strategies and approaches, community engagement in research settings was variable. Future studies should go deeper into community engagement theory, acknowledge the power dynamics underpin community engagement, and be more practical about the extent to which communities may participate.

Keywords: Community engagement; Empowerment; Low-and middle-income countries; Participation; Research settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Community engagement vancouver coastal health framework (source: www.vch.ca/ce)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PRISMA flow diagram for the systematic literature review
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Study characteristics of geographic regions of first/corresponding authors and study location
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Study characteristics of geographic regions and health research domains
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Systematic literature review Quality assessment results

References

    1. Ahmed SM, Palermo AGS. Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(8):1380–1387. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.178137. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Organization WH. Twenty steps for developing a healthy cities project. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1997.
    1. McCloskey DJ, Akintobi TH, Bonham A, Cook J, Coyne-Beasley T. Principles of Community Engagement (Second Edition). COMMUNITY Engagem. :197.
    1. Irish E, Burke K, Geyer E, Allard I. Patient Empowerment: A Partnership for Community Engagement in Three Phases. J Consum Health Internet. 2022;26(1):109–118. doi: 10.1080/15398285.2022.2030143. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luger TM, Hamilton AB, True G. Measuring community-engaged research contexts, processes, and outcomes: a mapping review. Milbank Q. 2020;98(2):493–553. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12458. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources