Longitudinal realist evaluation of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team (D-PACT) intervention: protocol
- PMID: 37160337
- PMCID: PMC10646200
- DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0019
Longitudinal realist evaluation of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team (D-PACT) intervention: protocol
Abstract
Background: Different dementia support roles exist but evidence is lacking on which aspects are best, for whom, and in what circumstances, and on their associated costs and benefits. Phase 1 of the Dementia PersonAlised Care Team programme (D-PACT) developed a post-diagnostic primary care-based intervention for people with dementia and their carers and assessed the feasibility of a trial.
Aim: Phase 2 of the programme aims to 1) refine the programme theory on how, when, and for whom the intervention works; and 2) evaluate its value and impact.
Design & setting: A realist longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation will be conducted in urban, rural, and coastal areas across South West and North West England where low-income or ethnic minority populations (for example, South Asian) are represented. Design was informed by patient, public, and professional stakeholder input and phase 1 findings.
Method: High-volume qualitative and quantitative data will be collected longitudinally from people with dementia, carers, and practitioners. Analyses will comprise the following: 1) realist longitudinal case studies; 2) conversation analysis of recorded interactions; 3) statistical analyses of outcome and experience questionnaires; 4a) health economic analysis examining costs of delivery; and 4b) realist economic analysis of high-cost events and 'near misses'. All findings will be synthesised using a joint display table, evidence appraisal tool, triangulation, and stakeholder co-analysis.
Conclusion: The realist evaluation will describe how, why, and for whom the intervention does or does not lead to change over time. It will also demonstrate how a non-randomised design can be more appropriate for complex interventions with similar questions or populations.
Keywords: caregivers; dementia; personalised care; primary health care; realist evaluation.
Copyright © 2023, The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Dowrick A, Southern A. Dementia 2014: opportunity for change. 2014. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/sites/default/files/migrate/downloads/deme.... [27 Jun 2023]. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/sites/default/files/migrate/downloads/deme... accessed.
-
- HM Government Health and Care Act 2022. 2022. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/31/contents/enacted. [27 Jun 2023]. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/31/contents/enacted accessed.
-
- Hossain MZ. The costs of caregiving: exploring the perceived burden of dementia among Bangladeshi caregivers in Britain. Am J Fam Ther. 2021; 49 (1):91–108. doi: 10.1080/01926187.2020.1777911. - DOI
-
- Iliffe S, Kendrick D, Morris R, Masud T, et al. Multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a community group exercise programme and home-based exercise with usual care for people aged 65 years and over in primary care. Health Technol Assess. 2014; 18 (49):vii–xxvii, 1–105. doi: 10.3310/hta18490. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous