Towards identifying a learning curve for robotic abdominal wall reconstruction: a cumulative sum analysis
- PMID: 37160504
- DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02794-z
Towards identifying a learning curve for robotic abdominal wall reconstruction: a cumulative sum analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Over the past decade, an increase has been seen in robotics used for hernia repair, specifically robotic abdominal wall reconstruction (rAWR). However, the learning curve for rAWR can be steep and presently, little is understood regarding the optimal case volume required to achieve proficiency. The aim of our study was to review skill acquisition and describe the learning curve for rAWR.
Methods: A retrospective, single-surgeon case series of consecutive patients who underwent rAWR from 2018 to 2022. The primary outcome was operative time, obtained from console time identified through the MyIntutive application. A one-sided cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) curve for the total operative time was derived based on the mean operative time of chronological procedures (207 min).
Results: 185 patients underwent rAWR between 2018 and 2022. These patients were more likely to be female, Caucasian, and have undergone two previous hernia repairs. ASA complexity increased over time with ASA 3 being predominant from 2020 onwards. The median hernia length was 15.0 cm and the median width was 7 cm. Average operative time was 207.8 min and decreased over time. The CUSUM analysis identified four phases of skill acquisition with the following case volumes: Initial Learning Curve (0-20), Stabilization Phase (21-55), Second Learning Curve (56-70), 4) Skill Proficiency (> 70).
Conclusion: In the early learning curve of rAWR, operative time decreased consistently after 70 cases, with an initial inflection after 20 cases. We identified varying stages of skill acquisition that are likely typical of a surgeon as they would progress through the learning curve of advanced robotic surgery. Future studies are needed to confirm the optimal case volume for determining the skill level for the performance of rAWR.
Keywords: Abdominal wall reconstruction; CUSUM; Component separation; Education; Learning curve.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repairs.Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3442-3450. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08665-x. Epub 2021 Jul 29. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 34327550
-
Long term outcomes of robotic-assisted abdominal wall reconstruction: a single surgeon experience.Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):645-656. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02774-3. Epub 2023 Mar 28. Hernia. 2023. PMID: 36977947
-
Learning curve of robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1827-1837. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08462-6. Epub 2021 Apr 6. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 33825019
-
Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Large Health System's Experience With the First 300 Cases and Review of the Literature.J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.070. Epub 2018 Oct 25. J Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 30691857 Review.
-
The reality of general surgery training and increased complexity of abdominal wall hernia surgery.Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1081-1091. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02062-z. Epub 2019 Nov 21. Hernia. 2019. PMID: 31754953 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Strength of small-bites abdominal wall closure using different suturing methods and materials in an experimental animal model.Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):527-535. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02945-2. Epub 2024 Jan 11. Hernia. 2024. PMID: 38212505
References
-
- Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB (2020) Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 3:e1918911–e1918911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Nguyen B, David B, Shiozaki T et al (2021) Comparisons of abdominal wall reconstruction for ventral hernia repairs, open versus robotic. Sci Rep 11:8086. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86093-6 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Martin-Del-Campo LA, Weltz AS, Belyansky I, Novitsky YW (2018) Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release. Surg Endosc 32:840–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5752-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bittner JG 4th, Alrefai S, Vy M et al (2018) Comparative analysis of open and robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 32:727–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5729-0 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Carbonell AM, Warren JA, Prabhu AS et al (2018) Reducing length of stay using a robotic-assisted approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis from the americas hernia society quality collaborative. Ann Surg 267:210–217. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002244 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous