Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 9;13(1):7484.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34185-w.

Influence of in utero fetal death on perineal tears in vaginal deliveries

Thibaud Boudry  1 , Marine Lallemant  1   2 , Rajeev Ramanah  1   3 , Nicolas Mottet  4   5
Affiliations

Influence of in utero fetal death on perineal tears in vaginal deliveries

Thibaud Boudry et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The aim of this work was to evaluate and compare the incidence of perineal tears and Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) after vaginal delivery following a in utero fetal death (IUFD) compared with those with a live-birth. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study using a database of all women who underwent a spontaneous vaginal delivery in the level III maternity ward. Exclusion criteria were breech presentation, cesarean section birth, instrumental delivery, multiple pregnancy, delivery before 24 + 6 weeks of gestation (WG) and termination of pregnancy for medical reasons. Women from the database were divided into two groups: an "in utero fetal death" (IUFD) group and a control group. Women were included in the IUFD group if they had a spontaneous vaginal delivery following a fetal demise after 24 + 6 WG in cephalic presentation between January 2006 and June 2020. Women in the "control" group were selected from the same database and were included if they underwent a spontaneous vaginal delivery of a live fetus in cephalic presentation, after 24 + 6 WG, during the same period. Each woman in the "IUFD" group was matched to two women (ratio 1:2) in the control group for parity, maternal age, body mass index, gestation and birth weight. The primary outcome was the presence of a sutured or unsutured perineal tear. During the study period, 31,208 patients delivered at a level III maternity hospital. Among them, 215 and 430 women were included in the IUFD group and the control group respectively. The two groups were comparable for all demographic and clinical characteristics except for an epidural analgesia (92% versus 70% in the control group, p < 0.01) and labor induction (86% versus 17% in the control group, p < 0.01). The incidence of any perineal tears was 13% (28/15) in the IUFD group versus 16% (70/430) in the control group. Relative risk of any perineal tears was non significative (RR = 0.8 IC95% [0.5-1.2]). The incidence of first-degree perineal tears was 10% in the IUFD group and 11% in the control group. The incidence of second-degree perineal tears was 18% in the IUFD group and 28% in the control group. Relative risk of first-degree perineal tears (RR = 0.88 95% CI [0.5-1.4]) and second-degree tears (RR = 0.51 95% CI [0.2-1.4]) were non significative. No obstetrical anal sphincter injury was found in either group. Vaginal delivery following a fetal demise did not appear to be either a risk factor or a protective factor for perineal tears. But there as a trend toward a lower incidence of second degree perineal tears in this context.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Thubert T, Cardaillac C, Fritel X, Winer N, Dochez V. Définitions, épidémiologie et facteurs de risque des lésions périnéales du 3e et 4e degrés. RPC Prévention et protection périnéale en obstétrique CNGOF. Gynécol. Obstétr. Fertil. Sénol. 2018;46(12):913–921. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Groutz A, Hasson J, Wengier A, Gold R, Skornick-Rapaport A, Lessing JB, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears: Prevalence and risk factors in the third millennium. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;204(4):347.e1–347.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pergialiotis V, Bellos I, Fanaki M, Vrachnis N, Doumouchtsis SK. Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth: An updated meta-analysis. Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020;247:94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, Burns EE. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: A prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-59. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farrar D, Tuffnell DJ, Ramage C. Interventions for women in subsequent pregnancies following obstetric anal sphincter injury to reduce the risk of recurrent injury and associated harms. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014;2014:11. - PMC - PubMed