Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;130(9):1096-1111.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17451. Epub 2023 Apr 16.

International multi-stakeholder consensus statement on clinical trial integrity

Khalid Saeed Khan  1 ; Cairo Consensus Group on Research Integrity
Collaborators, Affiliations

International multi-stakeholder consensus statement on clinical trial integrity

Khalid Saeed Khan et al. BJOG. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To prepare a set of statements for randomised clinical trials (RCT) integrity through an international multi-stakeholder consensus.

Methods: The consensus was developed via: multi-country multidisciplinary stakeholder group composition and engagement; evidence synthesis of 55 systematic reviews concerning RCT integrity; anonymised two-round modified Delphi survey with consensus threshold based on the average percentage of majority opinions; and, a final consensus development meeting. Prospective registrations: (https://osf.io/bhncy, https://osf.io/3ursn).

Results: There were 30 stakeholders representing 15 countries from five continents including triallists, ethicists, methodologists, statisticians, consumer representatives, industry representatives, systematic reviewers, funding body panel members, regulatory experts, authors, journal editors, peer-reviewers and advisors for resolving integrity concerns. Delphi survey response rate was 86.7% (26/30 stakeholders). There were 111 statements (73 stakeholder-provided, 46 systematic review-generated, 8 supported by both) in the initial long list, with eight additional statements provided during the consensus rounds. Through consensus the final set consolidated 81 statements (49 stakeholder-provided, 41 systematic review-generated, 9 supported by both). The entire RCT life cycle was covered by the set of statements including general aspects (n = 6), design and approval (n = 11), conduct and monitoring (n = 19), reporting of protocols and findings (n = 20), post-publication concerns (n = 12), and future research and development (n = 13).

Conclusion: Implementation of this multi-stakeholder consensus statement is expected to enhance RCT integrity.

Keywords: randomised controlled trials; research integrity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Steneck NH. Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Sci Eng Ethics. 2006;12(1):53-74.
    1. Resnik DB, Shamoo AE. The Singapore statement on research integrity. Account Res. 2011;18(2):71-5.
    1. Moher D, Bouter L, Kleinert S, Glasziou P, Sham MH, Barbour V, et al. The Hong Kong principles for assessing researchers: fostering research integrity. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(7):e3000737.
    1. Kretser A, Murphy D, Bertuzzi S, Abraham T, Allison DB, Boor KJ, et al. Scientific integrity principles and best practices: recommendations from a scientific integrity consortium. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019;25(2):327-55.
    1. Di Renzo G, Tosto VTV. The Island of research (one rule): do not block the path of enquiry. In: Di Renzo GC, editor. Essential writing, communication and narrative skills for medical scientists before and after the COVID era. Basel: Springer Nature; 2022. p. 1-17.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources