To replace or not to replace: What to do with the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator when the left ventricular function has improved
- PMID: 37161933
- DOI: 10.1111/jce.15931
To replace or not to replace: What to do with the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator when the left ventricular function has improved
Keywords: ejection fraction; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; risk stratification; sudden cardiac death.
Comment on
-
Risk of ventricular arrhythmias following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator change in patients with recovered ejection fraction: Implications for shared decision-making.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Jun;34(6):1405-1414. doi: 10.1111/jce.15913. Epub 2023 May 5. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023. PMID: 37146210
References
REFERENCES
-
- Kramer DB, Kennedy KF, Spertus JA, et al. Mortality risk following replacement implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation at end of battery life: results from the NCDR. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(2):216-221.
-
- Merchant FM, Quest T, Leon AR, El-Chami MF. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators at end of battery life. JACC. 2016;67(4):435-444.
-
- Smer A, Saurav A, Azzouz MS, et al. Meta-analysis of risk of ventricular arrhythmias after improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction during follow-up in patients with primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(2):279-286.
-
- Adabag S, Anand V, Gutierrez A. Replacement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators when ventricular function has recovered. In: Steinberg JS, Epstein AE, eds. Clinical Controversies in Device Therapy for Cardiac Arrhythmias. Springer; 2019:101-114.
-
- Chang DD, Pantlin PG, Benn FA, et al. Risk of ventricular arrhythmias following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator change in patients with recovered ejection fraction: implications for shared decision making. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical