Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;27(8):3856-3866.
doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2023.3275039. Epub 2023 Aug 8.

Beyond Heart Murmur Detection: Automatic Murmur Grading From Phonocardiogram

Beyond Heart Murmur Detection: Automatic Murmur Grading From Phonocardiogram

Andoni Elola et al. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Murmurs are abnormal heart sounds, identified by experts through cardiac auscultation. The murmur grade, a quantitative measure of the murmur intensity, is strongly correlated with the patient's clinical condition. This work aims to estimate each patient's murmur grade (i.e., absent, soft, loud) from multiple auscultation location phonocardiograms (PCGs) of a large population of pediatric patients from a low-resource rural area.

Methods: The Mel spectrogram representation of each PCG recording is given to an ensemble of 15 convolutional residual neural networks with channel-wise attention mechanisms to classify each PCG recording. The final murmur grade for each patient is derived based on the proposed decision rule and considering all estimated labels for available recordings. The proposed method is cross-validated on a dataset consisting of 3456 PCG recordings from 1007 patients using a stratified ten-fold cross-validation. Additionally, the method was tested on a hidden test set comprised of 1538 PCG recordings from 442 patients.

Results: The overall cross-validation performances for patient-level murmur gradings are 86.3% and 81.6% in terms of the unweighted average of sensitivities and F1-scores, respectively. The sensitivities (and F1-scores) for absent, soft, and loud murmurs are 90.7% (93.6%), 75.8% (66.8%), and 92.3% (84.2%), respectively. On the test set, the algorithm achieves an unweighted average of sensitivities of 80.4% and an F1-score of 75.8%.

Conclusions: This study provides a potential approach for algorithmic pre-screening in low-resource settings with relatively high expert screening costs.

Significance: The proposed method represents a significant step beyond detection of murmurs, providing characterization of intensity, which may provide an enhanced classification of clinical outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
PCG examples in time domain and their corresponding mel spectrograms used as inputs of the deep neural network. In the time domain, S1 and S2 are highlighted in orange and purple, respectively, and n.u. indicates normalized units.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Results of the quantitative analysis: (a) mean absolute amplitude of the systolic phase per class, and (b) mean±standard deviation (shades) power spectra of classes. In the figure n.u. indicates normalized units.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The full architecture of the residual neural network used in this study (panel a) and the architecture of each residual block (panel b).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Confusion matrix for classification using 10-fold cross-validation.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Patient-level unweighted mean of sensitivities (UMS) and mean F1-scores in function of the number of the models used in the ensemble.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Performance metrics and percentage of included patients when considering only those patients with γp<γth
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Results on the test set

References

    1. “World Health Organization – cardiovascular diseases (CVDs),” [Online]. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/, accessed: 2021-05-10.
    1. Carvalho S. M. d. et al., “Rheumatic fever presentation and outcome: a case-series report,” Revista brasileira de reumatologia, vol. 52, pp. 241–246, 2012. - PubMed
    1. Dwivedi AK et al., “Algorithms for automatic analysis and classification of heart sounds–a systematic review,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 8316–8345, 2018.
    1. Mangione S, “Cardiac auscultatory skills of physicians-in-training: a comparison of three English-speaking countries,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 210 – 216, 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002934300006732 - PubMed
    1. Clifford GD et al., “Recent advances in heart sound analysis,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 38, p. E10, 2017. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types