Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 10;13(5):e065697.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065697.

Intersection of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence: cross-sectional influences on women's contraceptive use in Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire and Kenya

Shannon N Wood  1   2 , Haley L Thomas  3 , Mary Thiongo  4 , Georges Guiella  5 , Fiacre Bazié  5 , Yentéma Onadja  5 , Rosine Mosso  6 , Raimi Fassassi  6 , Peter Gichangi  4   7   8 , Michele R Decker  3   2   9
Affiliations

Intersection of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence: cross-sectional influences on women's contraceptive use in Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire and Kenya

Shannon N Wood et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Among nationally representative cross-sections of women in need of contraception from Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire and Kenya, we aimed to: (1) examine the intersection of past-year physical/sexual intimate partner violence (IPV), emotional IPV and reproductive coercion (RC) and (2) assess the impact of physical/sexual IPV, emotional IPV and RC on women's contraceptive use outcomes, including current contraceptive use, method type and covert use.

Design: The present analysis uses cross-sectional female data collected in Burkina Faso (December 2020-March 2021), Côte d'Ivoire (October-November 2021) and Kenya (November-December 2020).

Settings: Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire and Kenya PARTICIPANTS: Analytical samples were restricted to partnered women with contraceptive need who completed a violence module (Burkina Faso n=1863; Côte d'Ivoire n=1105; Kenya n=3390).

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The exposures of interest-past-year emotional IPV, physical/sexual IPV and RC-were assessed using abridged versions of the Revised Conflict and Tactics Scale-2 and Reproductive Coercion Scale, respectively. Outcomes of interest included current contraceptive use, contraceptive method type (female controlled vs male compliant), and covert contraceptive use, and used standard assessments.

Results: Across sites, 6.4% (Côte d'Ivoire) to 7.8% (Kenya) of women in need of contraception experienced RC; approximately one-third to one-half of women experiencing RC reported no other violence forms (31.7% in Burkina Faso to 45.8% in Côte d'Ivoire), whereas physical/sexual IPV largely occurred with emotional IPV. In multivariable models, RC was consistently associated with covert use (Burkina Faso: aOR 2.84 (95% CI 1.21 to 6.64); Côte d'Ivoire: aOR 4.45 (95% CI 1.76 to 11.25); Kenya: aOR 5.77 (95% CI 3.51 to 9.46)). Some IPV in some settings was also associated with covert use (emotional IPV, Burkina Faso: aOR 2.99 (95% CI 1.56 to 5.74); physical/sexual, Kenya: aOR 2.35 (95% CI 1.33 to 4.17)).

Conclusions: Across settings, covert use is a critical strategy for women experiencing RC. Country policies must recognise RC as a unique form of violence with profound implications for women's reproductive health.

Keywords: GYNAECOLOGY; PUBLIC HEALTH; REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Venn diagrams of IPV and reproductive coercion experiences, among partnered women with need for contraception, by country. IPV, intimate partner violence.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sardinha L, Maheu-Giroux M, Stöckl H, et al. . Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018. Lancet 2022;399:803–13. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02664-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stylianou AM. Economic abuse within intimate partner violence: a review of the literature. Violence Vict 2018;33:3–22. 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00112 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heise L, Pallitto C, García-Moreno C, et al. . Measuring psychological abuse by intimate partners: constructing a cross-cultural indicator for the sustainable development goals. SSM Popul Health 2019;9(September 2018):100377. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100377 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silverman JG, Raj A. Intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion: global barriers to women’s reproductive control. PLoS Med 2014;11:e1001723. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001723 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grace KT, Anderson JC. n.d. Reproductive coercion. Trauma, Violence, Abus;2016:1–20. 10.1177/1524838016663935 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances