Characteristics associated with buying alcohol to-go and for delivery during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic among a national sample of US adults
- PMID: 37165791
- PMCID: PMC11227252
- DOI: 10.1111/dar.13659
Characteristics associated with buying alcohol to-go and for delivery during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic among a national sample of US adults
Abstract
Introduction: This study: (i) determined the population coverage of alcohol delivery and to-go/carryout policies (i.e., policies permitting bars/restaurants to sell individual drinks for off-site consumption) in 2019 and 2020; and (ii) identified characteristics associated with alcohol delivery and to-go purchases.
Methods: Data are from the National Alcohol Survey and Alcohol Policy Information System (n = 1677 adults, 52.1% female). Population coverage models summed state populations across state-level bar/restaurant delivery and to-go/carryout policies by beverage. Regression outcomes were past-year alcohol delivery and to-go purchases. Independent variables included demographics, excessive drinking, COVID-19 impacts and state COVID-19 bar/restaurant alcohol laws. Chi-squared tests and logistic regression models tested associations between delivery/to-go purchases and independent variables.
Results: Overall, 7.5% of adults had alcohol delivered and 14.5% bought alcohol to-go. From December 2019 to December 2020, the number of people living in states allowing beer/wine/spirits delivery (284%) and to-go sales (627%) rose steeply. People who were Black (vs. White; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.92, p < 0.001), excessive drinkers (vs. non-excessive drinkers; aOR 2.06, p < 0.001) or lived in states allowing beer/wine/spirits to-go sales (aOR 2.20, p = 0.01) had higher odds of buying alcohol to-go. Conversely, older people had lower odds of buying alcohol to-go (aOR 0.97, p < 0.001). People with some college or more (vs. high school degree or less, aOR 2.21, p < 0.001) and a higher economic burden (vs. fewer COVID-19 impacts, aOR 2.32, p = 0.05) had higher odds of alcohol delivery.
Discussion and conclusions: A select sub-population defined by socioeconomic status, race, excessive drinking and state policies bought alcohol for delivery or to-go in the Unites States.
Keywords: COVID-19; alcohol; alcohol policy; home delivery; to-go sales.
© 2023 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Alcohol to-go sales policies at on-premise drinking establishments near large public US universities during the COVID-19 pandemic.Alcohol Alcohol. 2024 Mar 16;59(3):agae023. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agae023. Alcohol Alcohol. 2024. PMID: 38632828 Free PMC article.
-
Beverage- and Context-Specific Alcohol Consumption During COVID-19 in the United States: The Role of Alcohol To-Go and Delivery Purchases.J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023 Nov;84(6):842-851. doi: 10.15288/jsad.22-00408. Epub 2023 Jul 11. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023. PMID: 37449953 Free PMC article.
-
Relationships between US state alcohol policies and alcohol outcomes: differences by gender and race/ethnicity.Addiction. 2020 Jul;115(7):1285-1294. doi: 10.1111/add.14937. Epub 2020 Feb 5. Addiction. 2020. PMID: 32026511 Free PMC article.
-
Alcohol policy changes during the first three-months of the COVID-19 pandemic: Development and application of a classification scheme.Int J Drug Policy. 2024 May;127:104373. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104373. Epub 2024 Mar 26. Int J Drug Policy. 2024. PMID: 38537492
-
Lower Strength Alcohol Products-A Realist Review-Based Road Map for European Policy Making.Nutrients. 2022 Sep 13;14(18):3779. doi: 10.3390/nu14183779. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 36145155 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Changes in US drinking and alcohol use disorders associated with social, health, and economic impacts of COVID-19.Alcohol Alcohol. 2024 Nov 18;60(1):agae082. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agae082. Alcohol Alcohol. 2024. PMID: 39657075
-
Effects of Expanding Direct-to-Consumer Alcohol Home Delivery Policies: Evidence From 18 States of Increases in Alcohol Use and Consequences.J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2025 May;86(3):330-339. doi: 10.15288/jsad.24-00273. Epub 2025 Mar 26. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2025. PMID: 40138212
-
Effects of direct-to-consumer alcohol home delivery policies on alcohol-related online searches in the United States from 2019 to 2023: A Google Trends study.Prev Med Rep. 2025 Feb 15;51:103005. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103005. eCollection 2025 Mar. Prev Med Rep. 2025. PMID: 40092917 Free PMC article.
-
Alcohol to-go sales policies at on-premise drinking establishments near large public US universities during the COVID-19 pandemic.Alcohol Alcohol. 2024 Mar 16;59(3):agae023. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agae023. Alcohol Alcohol. 2024. PMID: 38632828 Free PMC article.
-
Beverage- and Context-Specific Alcohol Consumption During COVID-19 in the United States: The Role of Alcohol To-Go and Delivery Purchases.J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023 Nov;84(6):842-851. doi: 10.15288/jsad.22-00408. Epub 2023 Jul 11. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023. PMID: 37449953 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fitzgerald N, Uny I, Brown A, Eadie D, Ford A, Lewsey J, et al. Managing COVID-19 transmission risks in bars: an interview and observation study. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. 2021;82(1):42–54. - PubMed
-
- Enos G. Bar settings offer dangerous mix during height of COVID-19 crisis. Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly. 2020;32(27):1–8.
-
- Steele CM, Josephs RA. Alcohol myopia. Its prized and dangerous effects. Am Psychol. 1990;45(8):921–33. - PubMed
-
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Dataset of State Alcohol-Related Laws During the COVID-19 Emergency for On-Premise and Off-Premise Establishments as of September 15, 2021 (XLSX, 122.75 KB). . Bethesa, MD: 2021.
-
- Lucas A. To-go cocktails will stick around in at least 20 states after the pandemic. CNBC. 2021. May 28, 2021;Sect. Tech to Table.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous