Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 4;6(2 Suppl):e250.
doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000250. eCollection 2023 May.

Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned?

Christopher Lee  1 , Erik Mayer  1 , Nicholas Bernthal  1 , Joseph Wenke  2 , Robert V O'Toole  3
Affiliations
Review

Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned?

Christopher Lee et al. OTA Int. .

Abstract

Orthopaedic infections remain challenging complications to treat, with profound economic impact in addition to patient morbidity. The overall estimates of infection after orthopaedic surgery with internal devices has been estimated at 5%, with hospital costs eight times that of those without fracture-related infections and with significantly poorer functional and pain interference PROMIS scores. Orthopaedic infection interventions have been focused on prevention and treatment options. The creation of new modalities for orthopaedic infection treatment can benefit from the understanding of the temporal relationship between bacterial colonization and host-cell integration, a concept referred to as "the race for the surface." Regarding prevention, host modulation and antibiotic powder use have been explored as viable options to lower infection rates. Orthopaedic infection treatment has additionally continued to evolve, with PO antibiotics demonstrating equivalent efficacy to IV antibiotics for the treatment of orthopaedic infections in recent studies. In conclusion, orthopaedic infections remain difficult clinical dilemmas, although evolving prevention and treatment modalities continue to emerge.

Keywords: basic science; infection; orthopaedic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Forest plot displaying efficacy of oral versus intravenous antibiotics for treatment of osteomyelitis. None of the highlighted studies have shown superiority of one treatment modality over the other. Note: The circle size represents the relative weight of an individual study's odds ratio within the overall meta-analysis, which is based on sample size and power analysis. The combined odds ratios are depicted by the shaded circle.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
There has been no difference in efficacy regarding infection eradication over multiple randomized controlled trials of antibiotics comparing short versus long treatment durations for varying infectious pathologies. CAP, community acquired pneumonia. GNR, gram-negative rod.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Schwarz EM, Parvizi J, Gehrke T, et al. 2018 International consensus meeting on musculoskeletal infection: research priorities from the general assembly questions. J Orthop Res. 2019;37:997–1006. - PubMed
    1. Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Morris MJ, et al. Two-stage treatment of hip periprosthetic joint infection is associated with a high rate of infection control but high mortality. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2013;471:510–518. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen AF, Heller S, Parvizi J. Prosthetic joint infections. Surg Clin N Am. 2014;94:1265–1281. - PubMed
    1. Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Son M-S, et al. Are we winning or losing the battle with periprosthetic joint infection: trends in periprosthetic joint infection and mortality risk for the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:3238–3245. - PubMed
    1. Charette RS, Melnic CM. Two-stage revision arthroplasty for the treatment of prosthetic joint infection. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11:332–340. - PMC - PubMed