Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 4:18:689-711.
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S365495. eCollection 2023.

Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?

Affiliations
Review

Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better?

Falk Roeder et al. Clin Interv Aging. .

Abstract

Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiation therapy in similar clinical scenarios compared to younger patients. However, there is no clear evidence for a generally reduced radiation tolerance with increasing age. Modern radiation techniques have clearly reduced acute and late side effects, thus extending the boundaries of the possible regarding treatment intensity in elderly or frail patients. Hypofractionated regimens have further decreased the socioeconomic burden of radiation treatments by reducing the overall treatment time. The current review aims at summarizing the existing data for the use of radiation therapy or chemoradiation in elderly patients focusing on the main cancer types. It provides an overview of treatment tolerability and outcomes with current standard radiation therapy regimens, including possible predictive factors in the elderly population. Strategies for patient selection for standard or tailored radiation therapy approaches based on age, performance score or comorbidity, including the use of prediction tests or geriatric assessments, are discussed. Current and future possibilities for improvements of routine care and creation of high-level evidence in elderly patients receiving radiation therapy are highlighted.

Keywords: elderly; geriatric assessment; radiation therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Falk Roeder received travel grants and lecture honoraria from Intraop Medical and PharmaMar. All other authors reported no competing interests.

References

    1. Exterman M, Brain E, Canin B, et al. Priorities for the global advancement of care for older adults with cancer: an update of the international society of geriatric oncology priorities initiative. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:e29–e36. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30473-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gomez-Millan J. Radiation therapy in the elderly: more side effects and complications? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2009;71:70–78. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.11.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horiot JC. Radiation therapy and the geriatric oncology patient. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1930–1935. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.10.5312 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ludmir E, Mainwaring W, Lin TA, et al. Factors associated with age disparities among cancer clinical trial participants. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:1769–1773. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2055 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. VanderWalde N, Hurria A, Jasgsi R. Improving consistency and quality of care for older adults with cancer: the challenges of developing consensus guidelines for radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98:721–724. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.042 - DOI - PubMed