Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation
- PMID: 37168538
- PMCID: PMC10166075
- DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15296
Retrospective study of influencing factors on the outcomes of luteal phase stimulation in patients with dual stimulation
Abstract
Background: Dual/double stimulation (DS) is an ovarian stimulation strategy that has emerged in recent years; it is characterized by two rounds of ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in the same menstrual cycle. DS can greatly shorten the time required to obtain valid embryos in assisted reproduction. For fertility preservation, DS can speed up oocyte storage process. However, factors influencing luteal phase ovarian stimulation (LPS) outcomes in DS have not been elucidated.
Methods: A total of 156 cycles from 78 cases were studied. Patients were grouped and analyzed according to their follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPS) types. Female ages, ovarian stimulation protocols, number of oocytes retrieved, embryo quality were recorded. Comparisons of outcomes were conducted between different groups.
Results: Our study found that LPS obtained similar outcomes to follicular phase stimulation (FPS), and that the choice of FPS protocol affected the efficiency of LPS, the antagonist protocol and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol resulted in better embryo outcomes in LPS. In LPS of DS, sufficient stimulation duration was the guarantee of embryo quality (number of available embryos: β = 0.145, 95% CI [0.078-0.211], P = 0.000; number of high-quality embryos: β = 0.114, 95% CI [0.057-0.171], P = 0.000).
Discussion: This study provided ideas for the precise use of DS. We suggest to further expand the sample size of DS in the future, conduct prospective controlled studies, unify the sample size of each subgroup, include the ovarian reserve of patients in the grouping basis, and exclude the influence of male factors. We hope that this study will help further refinement of DS so as to maximize patient benefits from it.
Conclusion: When the DS strategy is considered in the follicular phase, the antagonist protocol and PPOS protocol are more recommended for better embryo outcomes in LPS. During LPS, adequate ovarian stimulation duration is the most important guarantee for LPS efficiency.
Keywords: Dual stimulation (DS); Embryo quality; Follicular phase stimulation (FPS); Luteal phase stimulation (LPS).
© 2023 Chen et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.Hum Reprod. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1442-1448. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey217. Hum Reprod. 2018. PMID: 29912374 Free PMC article.
-
The euploid blastocysts obtained after luteal phase stimulation show the same clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as follicular phase stimulation-derived ones: a multicenter study.Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):2598-2608. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa203. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32951051
-
The best execution of the DuoStim strategy (double stimulation in the follicular and luteal phase of the same ovarian cycle) in patients who are poor ovarian responders.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 Oct 15;18(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00655-3. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020. PMID: 33059712 Free PMC article.
-
Flexible ovarian stimulation in a poor responder: a case report and literature review.Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Apr;26(4):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.020. Epub 2012 Dec 8. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013. PMID: 23497915 Review.
-
New stimulation regimens: endogenous and exogenous progesterone use to block the LH surge during ovarian stimulation for IVF.Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):211-220. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw047. Hum Reprod Update. 2017. PMID: 28062551 Review.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous