Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;65(5):901-905.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 9.

National Survey of Lung Cancer Screening Practices in Veterans Health Administration Facilities

Affiliations

National Survey of Lung Cancer Screening Practices in Veterans Health Administration Facilities

Eduardo R Núñez et al. Am J Prev Med. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer screening can save lives through the early detection of lung cancer, and professional societies recommend key lung cancer screening program components to ensure high-quality screening. Yet, little is known about the key components that comprise the various screening program models in routine clinical settings. The objective was to compare the utilization of these key components across centralized, hybrid, and decentralized lung cancer screening programs.

Methods: The survey was designed to identify current structures and processes of lung cancer screening programs. It was administered electronically to Veterans Health Administration facilities nationally (N=122) between August and December 2021. Results were analyzed between March and August 2022 and stratified by self-identified lung cancer screening program type, and we tested the hypothesis that centralized screening programs would be more likely to have implemented practices that support lung cancer screening, followed by hybrid and decentralized programs, using the Cochran-Armitage trend test.

Results: Overall, 69 (56.6%) facilities completed the survey, and respondents were lung cancer screening coordinators (39.1%), pulmonologists (33.3%), and oncologists (10.1%). Facilities most frequently self-identified as having a centralized (37.7%) program model, followed by identifying as having hybrid (30.4%) and decentralized (20.3%) programs. There was varying implementation of practices to support lung cancer screening, with hybrid and decentralized programs less likely to have lung cancer screening registries, lung cancer screening steering committees, or dedicated lung cancer screening coordinators.

Conclusions: Although there is overlap between the components of various lung cancer screening program types, centralized programs more frequently implemented practices before the initial screening to support lung cancer screening. This work provides a path for future investigations to identify which lung cancer screening practices are effective to improve lung cancer screening outcomes, which could help inform implementation in settings with limited resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There were no other conflicts of interest to report from the authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Screening practices upstream and downstream to the lung cancer screen (LCS) utilized by programs to support screening. * Refers to LCS components recommended by American Thoracic Society (ATS) and American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST), Abbreviations include: lung cancer screening (LCS), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

References

    1. Mazzone P, Powell CA, Arenberg D, et al. Components necessary for high-quality lung cancer screening: American College of Chest Physicians and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Chest. 2015;147(2):295–303. doi:10.1378/chest.14-2500 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wiener RS, Gould MK, Arenberg DA, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Policy Statement: Implementation of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Programs in Clinical Practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(7):881–891. doi:10.1164/rccm.201508-1671ST - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim RY, Rendle KA, Mitra N, et al. Racial Disparities in Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening and Recommended Follow-up Care: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. Published online February 15, 2022. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1253OC - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith HB, Ward R, Frazier C, Angotti J, Tanner NT. Guideline-Recommended Lung Cancer Screening Adherence Is Superior With a Centralized Approach. Chest. 2022;161(3):818–825. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.09.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sakoda LC, Rivera MP, Zhang J, et al. Patterns and Factors Associated With Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening in Diverse Practice Settings. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(4):e218559. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8559 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types