Prediction of maximum acceptable weight of lift in the horizontal and vertical planes using simulated job dynamic strengths
- PMID: 3717013
- DOI: 10.1080/15298668691390007
Prediction of maximum acceptable weight of lift in the horizontal and vertical planes using simulated job dynamic strengths
Abstract
An investigation was undertaken to determine the feasibility of predicting maximum weights of lift that are acceptable to individuals by measuring the individuals' simulated job dynamic strengths. Since almost all manual materials handling jobs are dynamic in nature, it was hypothesized that correlations between maximum weights acceptable for lifting and the dynamic strengths measured under similar conditions would be high compared to isometric strengths. If so, then a relatively simple procedure can be developed to estimate what people are willing to lift safely. With the use of a specially designed and constructed three-dimensional dynamic strength simulator, 19 males and 6 females lifted loads in two vertical and two horizontal planes. Their dynamic strengths also were measured under identical conditions. The correlations between simulated job dynamic strengths and acceptable weights of lift were much higher (0.52 to 0.67) compared to correlations between isometric strengths and acceptable weights of lift (0.29 to 0.38). This also confirmed earlier findings that dynamic strengths are more suitable predictors of the maximum weights people are willing to handle. Simple equations are presented between simulated job dynamic strengths and maximum acceptable weights of lift in the horizontal and vertical planes. These equations demonstrate that dynamic strength can be used reliably when matching jobs with individuals.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of isokinetic lifting strength with static strength and maximum acceptable weight with special reference to speed of lifting.Ergonomics. 1994 Aug;37(8):1363-74. doi: 10.1080/00140139408964915. Ergonomics. 1994. PMID: 7925260
-
Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.Ergonomics. 1996 Jun;39(6):862-76. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964507. Ergonomics. 1996. PMID: 8681928
-
Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes.Ergonomics. 1992 Jul-Aug;35(7-8):861-80. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967367. Ergonomics. 1992. PMID: 1633793
-
The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.Appl Ergon. 2007 Jan;38(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.02.001. Epub 2006 Apr 17. Appl Ergon. 2007. PMID: 16616883 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.Ergonomics. 1989 Sep;32(9):1125-44. doi: 10.1080/00140138908966879. Ergonomics. 1989. PMID: 2680481 Review.
Cited by
-
Concurrent validity of an isokinetic lift test used for admission to the Swedish Armed Forces.PLoS One. 2018 Nov 6;13(11):e0207054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207054. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30399188 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of isokinetic and isoinertial lifting tests as predictors of maximal lifting capacity.Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57(2):146-53. doi: 10.1007/BF00640654. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988. PMID: 3349979
-
The influence of task resistance on the characteristics of maximal one- and two-handed lifting exertions in men and women.Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;72(5-6):430-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00242272. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996. PMID: 8925813
-
Interrelationships among various measures of upper body strength assessed by different contraction modes. Evidence for a general strength component.Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;58(7):749-55. doi: 10.1007/BF00637387. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989. PMID: 2737196
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical