Subsequent fertility after cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective analysis
- PMID: 37170216
- PMCID: PMC10173584
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05584-8
Subsequent fertility after cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective analysis
Abstract
Background: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) refers to the implantation and growth of the gestational sac at a uterine scarring site due to a previous cesarean section. The effects of CSP on subsequent fertility have emerged as a clinical issue of importance in gynecology and obstetrics in China owing to the increasing rate of cesarean section over the past 30 years in combination with the abolition of the national family planning policy, allowing for subsequent pregnancies. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of CSP treatment on subsequent fertility and pregnancy outcomes.
Methods: The study consecutively enrolled 499 women treated for CSP at Taizhou Hospital between January 2009 and December 2018. The study outcomes were the rate of secondary infertility and pregnancy outcomes. Clinical information was collected at the time of admission for CSP treatment. Information on subsequent fertility and pregnancy outcomes was collected via telephonic follow-up.
Results: Among the 499 women who met the inclusion criteria for CSP, 48 were lost to follow-up. Most women (74.9%, 338/451) did not express the desire for a subsequent pregnancy after CSP treatment. Among the 113 women who initially desired a subsequent pregnancy, 62 finally abandoned fertility plans. Among the 51 women who pursued pregnancy, 48 pregnancies were recorded in 43 women, infertility secondary to CSP treatment was identified in 15.7% (8/51) of women, and 60.8% (31/51) of women achieved full-term pregnancy, with placenta accreta spectrum identified in two women, one requiring a hysterectomy during cesarean section due to massive bleeding. Among the 16 women treated with uterine artery embolization combined with uterine aspiration and 18 women treated by ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection combined with uterine aspiration, a successful full-term pregnancy rate of 68.8% (11/16) and 88.9% (16/18), respectively, was achieved. There were five cases of recurrent CSP among all 76 pregnancies (6.6%).
Conclusion: Over a long-term follow-up of women after CSP treatment, a high successful fertility rate was identified, with also an increased CSP recurrence rate. Uterine artery embolization combined with uterine aspiration and ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection combined with uterine aspiration showed high rates of successful post-treatment fertility and pregnancy.
Keywords: Cesarean scar pregnancy; Fertility; Recurrent; Women’s health.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy - a case series and review of the literature.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 May;200:102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.039. Epub 2016 Mar 8. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 27014853 Review.
-
Reproductive outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancies treated with uterine artery embolization combined with curettage.Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;61(4):601-605. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.08.005. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35779907
-
Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):883-890. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 8. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30205163
-
Trophoblastic microcirculation occlusion as an adjunct to electric vacuum aspiration for the treatment of endogenous cesarean scar pregnancy.Fertil Steril. 2023 Jan;119(1):146-150. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Nov 28. Fertil Steril. 2023. PMID: 36456211
-
Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Oct;99(10):1278-1289. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13918. Epub 2020 Jun 19. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020. PMID: 32419158
Cited by
-
Impact of Ectopic Pregnancy on the Outcomes of the Subsequent Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 10;14(12):4112. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124112. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40565859 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reproductive outcomes in women with prior cesarean scar pregnancies over six years.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):9696. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91371-8. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40113831 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical treatment and reproductive outcomes in caesarean scar pregnancy at a single center.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 May 11;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01225-7. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024. PMID: 38734672 Free PMC article.
-
Reply to the letter to the Editor "Treatment of ectopic pregnancy implanted on cesarean scar: other therapeutic approaches".Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2024 Aug 13;75(2):4260. doi: 10.18597/rcog.4260. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2024. PMID: 39470263 Free PMC article. English, Spanish.
-
Diagnostic value and efficacy evaluation value of transvaginal color doppler ultrasound parameters for uterine scar pregnancy and sub-type after cesarean section.BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01405-2. BMC Med Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39272005 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Family planning group of obstetrics and gynecology branch of the Chinese Medical Association Expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Chin J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;51:568–72.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous