Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 11;9(1):32.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00442-5.

Research evidence and implementation gaps in the engagement of people with lived experience in mental health and substance use research: a scoping review

Affiliations

Research evidence and implementation gaps in the engagement of people with lived experience in mental health and substance use research: a scoping review

Lisa D Hawke et al. Res Involv Engagem. .

Abstract

Background: There is growing recognition that engaging people with lived experience (PWLE) in mental health and substance use research improves the quality of the research in terms of relevance to the population and the feasibility of the work. Engagement also provides positive opportunities for research teams and the PWLE engaged. However, there are many gaps in the research on PWLE engagement. This scoping review synthesizes the gaps in the implementation of PWLE engagement and in the research on engagement as presented by research teams engaging PWLE in their work.

Method: A systematic electronic database search was conducted in 2022 for published articles on PWLE engagement in mental health and substance use research. Potential articles were screened for relevance. The search led to 49 final articles included in the review. The 49 articles were then coded using codebook thematic analysis to answer two research questions: (1) What are the research evidence gaps regarding the engagement of PWLE in mental health and substance use research?; and (2) What are the gaps in implementing PWLE engagement in mental health and substance use research? PWLE were engaged in the conduct of this review.

Results: Results showed that research evidence gaps include further work on conceptualizing engagement; developing resources, tools, and practice recommendations to support research teams; increasing diversity in evaluations of engagement; and evaluating engagement, including its impact on the research, on PWLE, and on researchers. Implementation gaps included several broader institutional gaps and gaps in the day-to-day practice of engagement.

Conclusions: Despite progress in PWLE engagement in mental health and substance use research in recent years, research evidence and implementation gaps remain. Research teams are encouraged to consider these gaps and conduct research and implementation activities to address them in a rigorous manner.

Keywords: Evidence gaps; Lived experience; Patient and public involvement; Patient engagement; Patient-oriented research; Research gaps.

Plain language summary

There is growing recognition that engaging people with lived experience (PWLE) in mental health and substance use research improves the quality of the research by making it more relevant to the population and more feasible. Engagement also provides positive opportunities for those working in this way. However, many questions remain unanswered in terms of PWLE engagement. We reviewed the published literature to identify gaps in the research on PWLE engagement and on the ways PWLE engagement is practiced in mental health and substance use research. We identified 49 articles addressing these issues. We examined each article to identify (1) research evidence gaps regarding the engagement of PWLE in mental health and substance use research; and (2) gaps in the way PWLE engagement is put into place in mental health and substance use research. We found that research evidence gaps include the need for further research work to understand what engagement and lived experience are; the need to develop resources, tools, and practice recommendations to support PWLE engagement; the need to increase the diversity of the PWLE engaged; and the need to evaluate the impact of engagement on the research, on PWLE, and on researchers. Gaps in the practice of PWLE engagement included several broader institutional gaps and gaps in the day-to-day practice. Despite progress in PWLE engagement in research in recent years, many gaps remain. Research teams are encouraged to conduct research to clarify these aspects of engagement and to implement engagement in ways that address these gaps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart for articles identified in the scoping review

References

    1. Johnston JN, Ridgway L, Cary-Barnard S, Allen J, Sanchez-Lafuente CL, Reive B, et al. Patient oriented research in mental health: matching laboratory to life and beyond in Canada. Res Involv Engagem. 2021;7(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00266-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sangill C, Buus N, Hybholt L, Berring LL. Service user’s actual involvement in mental health research practices: a scoping review. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019;28(4):798–815. doi: 10.1111/inm.12594. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carroll P, Dervan A, Maher A, McCarthy C, Woods I, Kavanagh R, et al. Applying patient and public involvement in preclinical research: a co-created scoping review. Health Expect. 2022;25(6):2680–99. doi: 10.1111/hex.13615. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheikhan NY, Kuluski K, Hebert M, McKee, S., Hawke LD. Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health research: a scoping review and content analysis. Health Expect. (under review). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pittaway E, Bartolomei L, Hugman R. Stop stealing our stories’: the ethics of research with vulnerable groups. J Hum Rights Pract. 2010;2(2):229–51. doi: 10.1093/jhuman/huq004. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources