Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2023 Sep;34(5):e63.
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e63. Epub 2023 May 1.

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator or vaginal tube use

Affiliations
Case Reports

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator or vaginal tube use

Eun Jung Yang et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

In the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been associated with significantly lower disease-free survival and overall survival rates. The proposed reasons for the increased recurrence and mortality associated with MIS are uterine manipulation, the effect of insufflation gas (CO2), and intracorporeal colpotomy. We applied 2 techniques during surgery to reduce tumor spillage in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH), which included avoiding using a uterine manipulator and containing the colpotomy using an endoscopic stapler. We aimed to introduce an easy and comfortable traction method with tagged uterine sutures instead of a manipulator or vaginal tube for minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (RH). The patient underwent LRH. After entering the peritoneal cavity, tubal ligation was performed with an endoscopic clip to prevent tumor spillage via the fallopian tubes. Then, the uterine fundus was tied with needle-straightened multifilament Vicryl 2-0, and the tagged uterus was manipulated. Thereafter, pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed before RH. Thereafter, we performed intracorporeal colpotomy by resecting the vagina twice using an endoscopic stapler. Finally, the stapled vaginal stump was resected to retrieve the specimen via the vaginal opening using monopolar scissors after the vagina was washed several times with sterile water. After removing the specimen, the vaginal stump was endoscopically closed with a barbed suture. LRH can be feasibly performed in patients with uterine cervical neoplasm by retracting tagged uterine sutures without the use of a uterine manipulator.

Keywords: Hysterectomy; Uterine cervical neoplasm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

    1. Meigs JV. Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissections; a report of 100 patients operated on five or more years ago. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1951;62:854–870. - PubMed
    1. Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1974;44:265–272. - PubMed
    1. Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013;108:63–69. - PubMed
    1. Mendivil AA, Rettenmaier MA, Abaid LN, Brown JV, 3rd, Micha JP, Lopez KL, et al. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a five year experience. Surg Oncol. 2016;25:66–71. - PubMed
    1. Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1895–1904. - PubMed

Publication types