Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 12;23(1):47.
doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00813-x.

Effect of emergency physician-operated emergency short-stay ward on emergency department stay length and clinical outcomes: a case-control study

Affiliations

Effect of emergency physician-operated emergency short-stay ward on emergency department stay length and clinical outcomes: a case-control study

Sean Moon et al. BMC Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: We hypothesized that an emergency short-stay ward (ESSW) mainly operated by emergency medicine physicians may reduce the length of patient stay in emergency department without expense of clinical outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed adult patients who visited the emergency department of the study hospital and were subsequently admitted to wards from 2017 to 2019. We divided study participants into three groups: patients admitted to ESSW and treated by the department of emergency medicine (ESSW-EM), patients admitted to ESSW and treated by other departments (ESSW-Other) and patients admitted to general wards (GW). The co-primary outcomes were ED length of stay and 28-day hospital mortality.

Results: In total, 29,596 patients were included in the study, and 8,328 (31.3%), 2,356 (8.9%), and 15,912 (59.8%) of them were classified as ESSW-EM, ESSW-Other and GW groups, respectively. The ED length of stay of the ESSW-EM (7.1 h ± 5.4) was shorter than those of the ESSW-Other (8.0 ± 6.2, P < 0.001) and the GW (10.2 ± 9.8, P < 0.001 for both). Hospital mortality of ESSW-EM (1.9%) was lower than that of GW (4.1%, P < 0.001). In the multivariable linear regression analysis, the ESSW-EM was independently associated with shorter ED length of stay compared with the both ESSW-Other (coefficient, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.46; P < 0.001) and GW (coefficient, 3.35; 95% confidence interval, 3.12-3.57; P < 0.001). In the multivariable logistic regression analyses, the ESSW-EM was independently associated with lower hospital mortality compared with both the ESSW-Other group (adjusted P = 0.030) and the GW group (adjusted P < 0.001).

Conclusions: In conclusion, the ESSW-EM was independently associated with shorter ED length of stay compared with both the ESSW-Other and the GW in the adult ED patients. Independent association was found between the ESSW-EM and lower hospital mortality compared with the GW.

Keywords: Emergency Department; Emergency Short-Stay ward; Length of stay.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The study flow diagram EM, emergency medicine; ESSW, emergency short-stay ward; GW, general ward; ICU, intensive care unit
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution, ED stay length and hospital mortality according to the study group 2A: distribution of the participants according to the study group; 2B: ED stay length according to the study group; 2C: hospital mortality according to the study group ***P < 0.001 ED, emergency department; EM, emergency medicine; ESSW, emergency short-stay ward; GW, general ward
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution, ED stay length and hospital mortality according to the study group and visit year 3A: distribution of the participants according to the study group and visit year; 3B: ED stay length according to the study group and visit year; 3C: hospital mortality according to the study group and visit year **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 ED, emergency department; EM, emergency medicine; ESSW, emergency short-stay ward; GW, general ward
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Distribution, ED stay length and hospital mortality according to the study group and KTAS level 4A: distribution of the participants according to the study group and KTAS level; 4B: ED stay length according to the study group and KTAS level; 4C: hospital mortality according to the study group and KTAS level *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 ED, emergency department; EM, emergency medicine; ESSW, emergency short-stay ward; GW, general ward; KTAS, Korean Triage and Acuity Scale

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singer AJ, Thode HC, Jr, Viccellio P, Pines JM. The Association between length of Emergency Department Boarding and Mortality. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(12):1324–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01236.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geelhoed GC, de Klerk NH. Emergency department overcrowding, mortality and the 4-hour rule in western Australia. Med J Aust. 2012;196(2):122–6. doi: 10.5694/mja11.11159. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones P, Schimanski K. The four hour target to reduce emergency department ‘waiting time’: a systematic review of clinical outcomes. Emerg Med Australasia. 2010;22(5):391–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01330.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones PG, Olsen S. Point prevalence of access block and overcrowding in New Zealand emergency departments in 2010 and their relationship to the ‘Shorter stays in ED’ target. Emerg Med Australasia. 2011;23(5):587–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01451.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoon BS, Choa MH, Kong TY, Joo YS, Ko DR, Hwang YJ, et al. The effect of time target on overcrowding and clinical quality in the ED: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Korean Soc Emerg Med. 2018;29(2):170–8.

LinkOut - more resources