Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 May 12;23(1):334.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04756-2.

Effect of pharmacogenomics testing guiding on clinical outcomes in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of pharmacogenomics testing guiding on clinical outcomes in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT

Xinrui Wang et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Pharmacogenomic testing guided treatment have been developed to guide drug selection or conversion in major depressive disorder patients. Whether patients benefit from pharmacogenetic testing remains unclear. We aim to evaluates the effect of pharmacogenomic testing guiding on clinical outcomes of major depressive disorder.

Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials were searched from inception until August 2022. Key terms included pharmacogenomic and antidepressive. Odds ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated using fixed-effects model for low or moderate heterogeneity or random-effects model for high heterogeneity.

Results: Eleven studies (5347 patients) were included. Compared with usual group, pharmacogenomic testing guided group was associated with an increased response rate at week 8 (OR 1.32, 95%CI 1.15-1.53, 8 studies, 4328 participants) and week 12 (OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.15-1.62, 4 studies, 2814 participants). Similarly, guided group was associated with an increased rate of remission at week 8 (OR 1.58, 95%CI 1.31-1.92, 8 studies, 3971 participants) and week 12 (OR 2.23, 95%CI 1.23-4.04, 5 studies, 2664 participants). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in response rate at week 4 (OR 1.12, 95%CI 0.89-1.41, 2 studies, 2261 participants) and week 24 (OR 1.16, 95%CI 0.96-1.41, 2 studies, 2252 participants), and remission rate at week 4 (OR 1.26, 95%CI 0.93-1.72, 2 studies, 2261 participants) and week 24 (OR 1.06, 95%CI 0.83-1.34, 2 studies, 2252 participants). Medication congruence in 30 days was significantly reduced in the pharmacogenomic guided group compared with the usual care group (OR 2.07, 95%CI 1.69-2.54, 3 studies, 2862 participants). We found significant differences between subgroups of target population in response and remission rate.

Conclusion: Patients with major depressive disorder may benefit from pharmacogenomic testing guided treatment by achieving target response and remission rates more quickly.

Keywords: Guided; Major depressive disorder; Pharmacogenomic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Forest plot of response rate at week 4, 8, 12, and 24 comparing pharmacogenomic testing guided treatment versus usual care treatment. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of remission rate at week 4, 8, 12, and 24 comparing pharmacogenomic testing guided treatment versus usual care treatment. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of medication congruence in 30 days comparing pharmacogenomic testing guided treatment versus usual care treatment. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

References

    1. Trivedi MH. Major Depressive Disorder in Primary Care: Strategies for Identification.J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81(2). - PubMed
    1. Roca M, Vives M, López-Navarro E, García-Campayo J, Gili M. Cognitive impairments and depression: a critical review. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2015;43(5):187–93. - PubMed
    1. Roca M, Monzón S, Vives M, López-Navarro E, Garcia-Toro M, Vicens C, et al. Cognitive function after clinical remission in patients with melancholic and non-melancholic depression: a 6 month follow-up study. J Affect Disord. 2015;171:85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rock PL, Roiser JP, Riedel WJ, Blackwell AD. Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2014;44(10):2029–40. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002535. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keilp JG, Gorlyn M, Russell M, Oquendo MA, Burke AK, Harkavy-Friedman J, et al. Neuropsychological function and suicidal behavior: attention control, memory and executive dysfunction in suicide attempt. Psychol Med. 2013;43(3):539–51. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712001419. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources