Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 May 5;20(9):5728.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095728.

Gait Training with Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Mobility in People Post-Stroke

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Gait Training with Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Mobility in People Post-Stroke

Maria Tereza Artero Prado Dantas et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

(1) Background: Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability. To identify the best treatment strategies for people with stroke (PwS), the aim of the current study was to compare the effects of training on a treadmill with functional electrical stimulation (TT-FES) with training on a treadmill (TT), and to analyze the effects of sequence of training on mobility and the parameters of walking ability. (2) Methods: Prospective, longitudinal, randomized and crossover study, in which 28 PwS were distributed into groups, namely the A-B Group (TT-FES followed by TT) and B-A Group (TT followed by TT-FES), using the foot drop stimulator, and were measured with functional tests. (3) Results: We found improved mobility, balance, non-paretic limb coordination, and endurance only in the group that started with TT-FES. However, sensorimotor function improved regardless of the order of training, and paretic limb coordination only improved in the B-A Group, but after TT-FES. These data indicate that the order of the protocols changed the results. (4) Conclusions: Although biomechanical evaluation methods were not used, which can be considered a limitation, our results showed that TT-FES was superior to isolated training on a treadmill with regard to balance, endurance capacity, and coordination of the non-paretic limb.

Keywords: electrical stimulation; gait; hemiparesis; mobility; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of group sequence of training. TT-FES: treadmill sequence of training with the use of FES; TT: treadmill sequence of training without electrical stimulation.

References

    1. Bonita R., Mendis S., Truelsen T., Bogousslavsky J., Toole J., Yatsu F. The global stroke initiative. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:391–393. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00800-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsao C.W., Aday A.W., Almarzooq Z.I., Anderson C.A.M., Arora P., Avery C.L., Baker-Smith C.M., Beaton A.Z., Boehme A.K., Buxton A.E., et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023;147:e93–e621. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123. Erratum in Circulation 2023, 147, e622. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hendricks H.T., Van Limbeek J., Geurts A.C., Zwarts M.J. Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review of the literature. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2002;83:1629–1637. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.35473. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levine D.A., Galecki A.T., Langa K.M., Unverzagt F.W., Kabeto M.U., Giordani B., Wadley V.G. Trajectory of Cognitive Decline After Incident Stroke. JAMA. 2015;314:41–51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6968. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lima D.H.F., Queiroz A.P., Salvo G., Yoneyama S.M., Oberg T.D., Lima N.M.F.V. Brazilian version of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment: Validity, agrément and rehability. Rev. Bras. Fisioter. 2010;14:166–175. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552010005000006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types