Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 27;13(9):1489.
doi: 10.3390/ani13091489.

Evaluation of the Analgesic Efficacy of Undiluted Intraperitoneal and Incisional Ropivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Dogs after Major Abdominal Surgery

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Analgesic Efficacy of Undiluted Intraperitoneal and Incisional Ropivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Dogs after Major Abdominal Surgery

Inken S Henze et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Recommendations for intraperitoneal (IP) and incisional (INC) administration of local anaesthetics after visceral surgery exist, but evidence is scarce. This prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled, clinical trial compared postoperative pain in dogs undergoing major abdominal surgery. Sixteen client-owned dogs were anaesthetized with a standardized balanced protocol including opioids and received either 2 mg/kg ropivacaine IP (0.27 mL/kg) and a 1 mg/kg INC splash (0.13 mL/kg) or equal volumes of saline. Influence of the treatment on heart rate (HR) and postoperative pain was assessed using the Short Form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (GCPS-SF), a dynamic interactive visual analogue scale (DIVAS) and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing (MNT). Data was tested with mixed ordinal regression and log linear mixed models for 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after extubation. Rescue analgesia was given to 3/8 dogs after ropivacaine and 0/8 dogs after saline. GCPS-SF and MNT were not different between groups. DIVAS was slightly higher after ropivacaine (odds increased by 5.44 (confidence interval (CI) 1.17-9.96, p = 0.012)), and HR after ropivacaine was 0.76 * that after saline (CI 0.61-0.96, p = 0.02) with no effect of time (p = 0.1). Undiluted ropivacaine IP and INC was not beneficial for postoperative analgesia.

Keywords: anaesthesia; analgesia; canine; companion animals; laparotomy; locoregional; pain; visceral surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Visualised analgesic protocol and interventions for 16 dogs undergoing major abdominal surgery, and receiving either ropivacaine 2 mg/kg intraperitoneally and 1 mg/kg incisionally (group Ropivacaine), or an equal volume of isotonic saline (group Control), until extubation. Note that the distances on the chart are not true to real time scale. The green bar displays the part of the study the animal spent in the surgical theatre. IM = intramuscular, IV = intravenous, CRI = continuous rate infusion, IP = intraperitoneal, INC = incisional.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(ac). Pain scores as attained with (a) the Short Form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (GCPS-SF), (b) the dynamic interactive visual analogue scale (DIVAS), and (c) values for mechanical nociceptive threshold testing (MNT) of eight dogs in group Control and group Ropivacaine, respectively, represented as boxplots. The median and the upper (75%) and lower (25%) quartile are depicted with the box while the whiskers indicate the range. The dotted line in the GCPS-SF diagram represents the cutoff value at which rescue analgesia was administered.

References

    1. Perret-Gentil F., Doherr M., Spadavecchia C., Levionnois O. Attitudes of Swiss veterinarians towards pain and analgesia in dogs and cats. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2014;156:111–117. doi: 10.1024/0036-7281/a000560. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mathews K., Kronen P.W., Lascelles D., Nolan A., Robertson S., Steagall P.V., Wright B., Yamashita K. Guidelines for Recognition, Assessment and Treatment of Pain. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2014;55:E10–E68. doi: 10.1111/jsap.12200. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carpenter R.E., Wilson D.V., Evans A.T. Evaluation of intraperitoneal and incisional lidocaine or bupivacaine for analgesia following ovariohysterectomy in the dog. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2004;31:46–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2004.00137.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campagnol D., Teixeira-Neto F.J., Monteiro E.R., Restitutti F., Minto B.W. Effect of intraperitoneal or incisional bupivacaine on pain and the analgesic requirement after ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2012;39:426–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2012.00728.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lambertini C., Kluge K., Lanza-Perea M., Bruhl-Day R., Guerrero K.S.K. Comparison of intraperitoneal ropivacaine and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2018;45:865–870. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2018.06.012. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources