Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 26;12(9):1768.
doi: 10.3390/plants12091768.

Extracts and Residues of Common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) Cause Alterations in Root and Shoot Growth of Crops

Affiliations

Extracts and Residues of Common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) Cause Alterations in Root and Shoot Growth of Crops

Rea Maria Hall et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Following the novel weapon hypothesis, the invasiveness of non-native species, such as common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) can result from a loss of natural competitors due to the production of chemical compounds, which negatively affect native communities. Particularly the genus Ambrosia produces several types of organic compounds, which have the potential to inhibit germination and growth of other plants. Subsequent to an assessment of the chemical content of three different ragweed extracts (aqueous shoot and root extracts, as well as essential oil), two different trials on the effects of different concentrations of these extracts, as well as ragweed residues, were conducted on two different mediums (Petri dish vs. soil). In addition, we investigated the impact on the infection potential of Bradyrhizobium japonicum on soybean roots in three different soil types (arable soil, potting soil, and sand). The results showed that the exposure to common ragweed extracts and residues induced changes in the biomass and root production of crops and ragweed itself. Even though crops and ragweed differed in their response behavior, the strongest negative impact on all crops and ragweed was observed with ragweed residues, leading to reductions in biomass and root growth of up to 90%. Furthermore, we found a decrease in the number of rhizobial nodules of up to 48% when soybean was exposed to ragweed root extract.

Keywords: aqueous root extracts; aqueous shoot extract; common ragweed; essential oil; residues; rhizobial nodules.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Root length (cm) of (a) soybean, (b) wheat, (c) maize, and (d) ragweed in dependence of the concentration of aqueous leaf extract (ST), aqueous root extract (RT), essential oil (EO), and residues (Resi) of ragweed 24 days after seeding (n = 10, significance levels: n.s. = not signficant, *** p < 0.001 refer to the untreated control).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(ad) Aboveground dry matter (mg) of (a) soybean, (b) wheat, (c) maize, and (d) ragweed in dependence of the concentration of aqueous leaf extract (ST), aqueous root extract (RT), essential oil (EO), and residues (Resi) of ragweed 24 days after seeding (n = 10, significance levels: n.s. = not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 refer to the untreated control).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(ad) Root dry matter (mg) of (a) soybean, (b) wheat, (c) maize, and (d) ragweed in dependence of the concentration of aqueous leaf extract (ST), aqueous root extract (RT), essential oil (EO), and residues (Resi) of ragweed 24 days after seeding (n = 10, significance levels: n.s. = not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 refer to the untreated control).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of nodules in relation to the presence of ragweed roots (Root), presence of undiluted root extract of ragweed (AqR), or untreated (control = C) in three different substrates (soil from arable field, potting soil, and sand); n = 10, different letters indicate significant differences.

References

    1. Wilcove D.S., Rothstein D., Dubow J., Phillips A., Losos E. Quantifying Threats to Imperiled Species in the United States. BioScience. 1998;48:607–615. doi: 10.2307/1313420. - DOI
    1. Pimentel D., Lach L., Zuniga R., Morrison D. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience. 1999;50:53–65. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0053:EAECON]2.3.CO;2. - DOI
    1. Thorpe A.S., Thelen G.C., Diaconu A., Callaway R.M. Root exudate is allelopathic in invaded community but not in native community: Field evidence for the novel weapons hypothesis. J. Ecol. 2009;97:641–645. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01520.x. - DOI
    1. Keane R.M., Crawley M.J. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002;17:164–170. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0. - DOI
    1. Blossey B., Notzold R. Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A Hypothesis. J. Ecol. 1995;83:887–889. doi: 10.2307/2261425. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources