The impact of extending the second stage of labor on repeat cesarean section and maternal and neonatal outcome
- PMID: 37177788
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14855
The impact of extending the second stage of labor on repeat cesarean section and maternal and neonatal outcome
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of extending the second stage of labor in women attempting a trial of labor after a cesarean section (TOLAC).
Method: A retrospective cohort study comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes following TOLAC over two periods: period I whose prolonged second stage was considered 2 h, and period II whose prolonged second stage was considered 3 h. The primary outcome was repeat cesarean delivery (CD) rate.
Results: Incidence of repeat CD was significantly lower in period II (18.1% vs 29.7%, P < 0.001). Incidence of uterine rupture was significantly higher in period II (P < 0.001). Instrumental delivery rates were significantly higher in period II (26.2% vs 15.6%, odds ratio [OR] 1.67, 95% CI 1.21-3.56, P < 0.001). Rates of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations, chorioamnionitis, and length of hospital stay were similar between groups. Incidence of fetal acidemia was significantly higher in period II (1.5% vs 0.7%, OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.32-5.63, P < 0.001), and incidence of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission was significantly higher (2.5% vs 1.6%, P = 0.004).
Conclusion: Extension of the second stage of labor is associated with a decrease in repeat CD rate with a concomitant increase in instrumental delivery rates, uterine rupture, fetal acidemia, and NICU admissions. These findings may warrant further consideration of allowing a prolonged second stage in patients attempting TOLAC.
Keywords: cesarean delivery; instrumental delivery; neonatal outcomes; postpartum hemorrhage; second stage of labor; trial of labor after cesarean; vaginal birth after cesarean; vaginal delivery.
© 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Fitzpatrick KE, Kurinczuk JJ, Bhattacharya S, Quigley MA. Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: a population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland. PLoS Med. 2019;16(9):e1002913. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002913
-
- Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581-2589. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040405
-
- Lisonkova S, Mehrabadi A, Allen VM, et al. Atonic postpartum hemorrhage: blood loss, risk factors, and third stage management. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016;38(12):1081-1090.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2016.06.014
-
- Zhang M, Su Q, Cao Y, Zhao M, Huang D. Safety and feasibility of trial of vaginal labor after cesarean section: a retrospective study. Medicine. 2020;99(46):e22844. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000022844
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):179-193. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources